|
No for many reasons.
First amongst those reasons is that the Saudis are significantly culturally different than other Arabs. They are much more backward, and they are that way because of their culture and not their political system. They have been that way for many centuries. No popular revolution can change what is really a popular sentiment for them: their way of life.
Second, the Saudi government is more stable because it is not a dictatorship but a feudal monarchy with a whole class of princes and well-paid insiders and mercenaries with a strong vested interest in the government's continued success.
Third, because Saudi Arabia still is responsible for an overwhelming proportion of the world's oil supply, and the country also has great latitude in the region. The ramifications of Saudi Arabia destabilizing - unlike loser countries like Syria or economically unimportant countries like Egypt - would be too great to allow. All parties, from France and Russia to the US and Israel to Yemen and Jordan, would do whatever would have to be done to prevent that from happening.
Fourth, Saudi Arabia has no real democratic movement, but Islamic militancy has a strong foothold there, and it is likely that should the monarchy fall, it would be replaced by a radical Islamic theocracy. The US and Israel would never allow that.
This event is...nothing. It won't trigger anything in Saudi Arabia, and most of the citizens simply won't care.
Aestu of Bleeding Hollow... Nihilism is a copout.
|
