Tehra wrote:
Myriad of pc hardware equates to incompatibilities.
That's my "mac does this better" argument.
I won't doubt that for the tech savvy consumer....with a PC you can get it cheaper (heck, build it yourself!), upgrade more things more easily, etc.
However, with a PC you're using things from many different companies that don't always work well together. You have a windows operating system, with hardware from a different company, with graphics cards from a different company, you need this driver for this thing, that driver for that thing, etc.
With Apple computers, it all comes through one company. You can't convince me that compatibility and functionality don't get a boost as a result. What made iTunes and the iPod so successful? The seamless connection between the hardware and software certainly helped. Yes, perhaps PCs have caught up with recording latency etc....but again it's still all coming through Apple.
Think about the iLife suite...GarageBand comes STANDARD on any Apple computer, and it can at least compete with ProTools. Do PCs come standard with such robust software?
I think the issue is that it comes down to philosophy. Apple has assumed that consumers are morons when it comes to tech. They have assumed that consumers can't help themselves and don't want to have to deal with troubleshooting all sorts of compatibility bullshit. They want to turn on their computer, plug in their Guitar, and start jamming. Well if their profits and success as a company is any indication, this is a pretty good assumption for many consumers.
But for PCs? If you want to control more parts of it, upgrade it, make it the strongest comp you can...then yeah, go with PC.
You can't argue that there's no strength in the Apple philosophy. You can't argue that there aren't some things it can do better than PCs because of it.