Azelma wrote:
And why might that be? Do you think women inherently are born and just have this focus on beauty being important? Or do you think that maybe it's part of society, both pressures from men, and other women propelling the viewpoint?
What's one of the first questions asked of men when discussing a potential girlfriend, or the new girl at work, or the new girl in class.... "is she hot?" Look at the employees at many large companies (specifically marketing firms)...all the women happen to be incredibly attractive. Look at pharmaceutical reps, etc. Is this coincidence? I think not. How do we judge the success of our sexual exploits -- How attractive was she? Men get a little of this, but not nearly as much. For a man, it's much more important to be a provider, to be smart, strong, and competitive.
To be a woman is to know how to be beautiful. Why do women even have makeup? Why do they go through all the relentless pruning and primping to get ready to go out? Do you think it's purely a female construct that they would put themselves through horrible things like wearing high heels? Why do they wear high heels? Because it raises their ass and makes it look better. Why do they do that?
Who will go further in life, the woman wearing baggy jeans and sweatshirts all day with no makeup, or the woman dressed in a sexy dress with beautiful hair and makeup done just perfectly? Who will get more male attention?
All of which is human nature and culturally universal.
That is the hard counter to the "gender is a social construct" bullshit. Like many viewpoints in contemporary America, it's an ideology born of ignorance.
Azelma wrote:
The reason of the question is so we know how to think about the baby, how to judge it, how to raise it, how to interact with it, what products we should buy it etc.
I don't see it as driving home that "absurdity" because Sex and Gender are two different things.
No, they aren't. Gender and sex are synonyms. The argument to the contrary is nonsense, and the proof that it's bullshit is that it is
non-falsifiable.
Azelma wrote:
If you have a dick, okay, you are of the male sex. But what if you're attracted to guys? What if you like wearing women's clothing and putting on makeup. What if you feel very feminine and want a boyfriend. Not to be vulgar, but what if the act of being penetrated is more arousing to you than penetrating?
Irrelevant. Has no bearing on gender.
Azelma wrote:
Again, I don't know the answer to these questions, and I can't presume to know what goes on in the mind of someone who is transgender. What I can say is that I've known people like that...and it's very fundamental to who they are.
Which is proof that they are perverts, driven by the vacuousness of their character. If your sexuality is the fundamental definition of your person, you need to "get a life".
The same is true of a heterosexual sexaholic.
Azelma wrote:
Think of it culturally. It's a loose connection, but stay with me. I know this one girl, she's a white girl. She's obsessed with everything Asian. OBSESSED with Asian culture. She joined an Asian sorority, has only asian friends, only dates Asian men, is obsessed with anime, learning Japanese etc, asian cooking etc. She has told me, and I quote, "I was born to the wrong race" -- now yes, it's a little weird, but obviously something innate in her yearns to be fully a part of that culture and that race. Who am I to say "well, that's just fucked up, you're a white girl there's something wrong with you. Embrace your own culture"
You are arguing a fallacy commonly pushed by the ultra-liberal crowd - that all variables that define the human condition are mutually interchangeable and operate according to the same rules.
Obviously, race, gender, sexual preference and culture are all completely different variables, driven by completely different things, and they operate in different ways. Your analogy between them is inherently baseless.
More likely your friend is just a loser. She can't find an identity for herself within the framework of her own culture, so she seeks validation by way of another.
Doing things that have absolutely nothing to do with that culture, such as dating men of the Asian race, learning Japanese, learning Asian cooking, are proof of that. They are way of seeking validation, but they have nothing to do with understanding and identifying with the culture.
A culture is a set of shared beliefs, values, attitudes, a common history. How well does she actually understand Asians? How much does she know about their history? About their way of life? How does her knowledge of their culture influence her views and behavior? Never mind, of course, that while Asian cultures do tend to have some things in common (amongst them a strong sense of "face" and a value system that honors hard work and filial & personal loyalty above all else) they are very diverse.
Take me, for example. I am Jewish-American, and my interest is in the classical cultures. I don't run around in a toga or wear earlocks or a Star of David necklace or use Latin expressions in daily speech, or cook ancient Roman recipes or latkes. Instead, when I talk about my cultural background, I talk about how it influenced me, how I understand and take something from those cultures. I also frequently talk about the French and German way of life; not that I love berets and wine or sausages, but that I understand what those people believe and what makes them do what they do, and I try to adapt their cultural distinctiveness in the service of my own development.
I remember working for that pawn shop a few years back. The proprietor was a neo-Nazi, but he was also a very nice guy. I came to understand that for him, this obsession with collecting Nazi relics (he actually subscribed to a catalogue that sold them - he also collected lunchboxes from the 50s) was the product of an absence of real culture.
I would argue the same is true of your friend, and many people on this forum. The lack of real cultural identity leads them to seek personal definition through political affiliation. This is why I have come to believe that this country can only be fixed by establishing a clearly defined culture.
Azelma wrote:
The mind and body are separate things. You of all people should recognize that the expectations and standards thrust upon you mean dick, Aestu. Your mind, your will, is what's most important. After all, aren't our bodies just disgusting sacks of flesh which are vessels for our minds (or our "souls" if you believe in such a thing)? Most of the time everything matches up (mind and body). But sometimes, for whatever reason, it doesn't. That's okay in my book, and we shouldn't disregard it just because it's not our experience.
Mind-body dualism is a paradox that is not relevant to discussions about tangibles, and merely serves as a way of escaping burden of proof.
Proving my point: this gender crap is BS because it's not falsifiable.