dek wrote:
I'll sound like Aestu when I say this, but agnosticism is a cop out.
Here's a good analogy. Do you believe in leprechauns? Probably not.
Do you have any evidence that leprechauns don't exist? Of course not. Could you point to a single shred of evidence that they don't exist? No. Is it possible they do exist? Yes, and in fact, their existence, based on the legend of leprechauns, would mesh perfectly with reality - most tales of leprechauns have them as masters of staying undetected. Therefore, not only can you not prove they don't exist, but the tale of their existence seems to correlate to your experience relating to them perfectly.
But again; do you believe in leprechauns? No, you don't. The only reason you don't have the same feeling about God is because someone who you viewed as an authority figure as a child told you he exists. It's psychological, and nothing else.
Disagree. Leprechauns are simply a mythical creature who's existence, or lack thereof, would not answer any deep philosophical questions.
The idea of God, and all religion, is the attempt to answer basic fundamental questions that humanity/science cannot provide exact answers to (there are more, but here are the big 3):
1. Why are we here?
2. What exactly created life/the universe?
3. We are aware that we will die - what, if anything happens after we die?
Agnosticism is not a cop-out in this situation, because, I believe, we cannot know the answers to these questions for sure. We can theorize, hypothesize, argue and debate (religion and science both do this), but we can never truly know the answers...which makes agnosticism make perfect sense (at least to me). Now, gnostic people will claim that they know the answers to these questions:
Gnostic theist
1. God put us here coz he loves us
2. God did it
3. Go to heaven/hell
Gnostic atheist:
1. No real reason - random evolution and shit just happened.
2. Big Bang (or some other theory)
3. Nothing, just blackness
As an agnostic, I see flaws in all 6 of these answers provided by gnostics - because again, we cannot know.