Yuratuhl wrote:
It's not that they're morons (they are, but that's not the reason), it's that people want news immediately these days, no matter the situation, so any given news organization doesn't have the time to fact-check or verify everything before rushing to publish/release/air. It's easier to print a retraction the new day than it is to lose viewers/subscribers because your competition got the word out while you were scanning documents to make sure it was right.
I don't condone sensationalism, but that's the current state of affairs.
It's not so much sensationalist as it is the imperative; to most established news organizations, breaking news isn't
that big of an accomplishment. It's just something that happens. The AP, for one, generally only breaks stories to the public when the facts have been checked to a reasonable extent. (Not that they're immune to inconsistencies or errors—it's just that the AP as a wire service is designed for breaking news. There's a system in place to prevent wanton misinformation, à la that of CNN during most "breaking" events during its lifetime, but it's not perfect.)