Dvergar wrote:
Jubbergun wrote:
Oh, I'm sorry, is this coming from the "history major" that thinks it was Republicans that filibustered the civil right act? Better start boarding up the windows on that glass house, bro.
Your Pal,
Jubber
Yeah, completely posted the wrong thing on that one, was in a hurry and wasn't thinking (all the worse because I remember posting quite a lot on the thread where we showed that all those Democrat spots became Republican spots because the Democratic leadership were the ones fighting for equality while the south just wanted to keep hatin dem nigras).
Spots? As in seats, or as in people? Relatively few of those responsible for the filibuster became Republicans. In fact, Robert Byrd remained in the senate as a democrat until he died and was hailed as some great pinnacle of humanity, his actions during the 60s glossed over as past folly despite his occasional lapses wherein he openly used racial slurs or waxed nostalgic about the KKK. Hell, we even elected one of Senator Fulbright's proteges to the presidency...again as a democrat.
Dvergar wrote:
No, Jubber sees this as republicans versus democrats. He sees it as "liberals were ok with AG during Bush, but now that it's Obama they see things differently". He's not making an issue of what Obama should do, he just wants to cry about how people who have no say over the release see the issue. He didn't understand what happened with the AG photos, and nothing in his original post had anything to do with what you posted.
No, I see this very simply as what was good for the goose being good for the gander. The same people that went into orgasmic spasms about being able to paint our country/Bush as barbaric regardless of the consequences abroad by publishing photos that were embarrassing to the nation don't get to come back a few years later and tut-tut the idea of releasing these pictures because they might "incite violence." The idea that one set of pictures that is (or could be) damaging to the national reputation and/or "incite violence" is fine for publication but that another similar set should be hidden from view is hypocrisy, obviously motivated by political partisanship, and worthy of derision. It is patently political, I don't have to make it that way.
Your Pal,
Jubber