Jubbergun wrote:
Aestu wrote:
Perhaps because I don't like ten-letter words that begin with "R".
Aestu wrote:
I'm not a partisan so that doesn't apply.
Those two statements are not entirely compatible.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OsmiumJubbergun wrote:
Azelma wrote:
Mayo pointed out correctly that the debt ceiling fiasco was a result of house republicans stalling.
Stalling was the right thing to do. There's no point in having a "debt ceiling" if you're just going to raise the bar every time you hit the limit.
Getting in the way when you don't have any better ideas is retarded in any setting.
During the Clinton years, the GOP shut down government even during budgets that were in the black. Therefore, it is not logical to believe that the debt was actually their motivation for doing the same thing again.
Jubbergun wrote:
I saw bits of the Romney video on The Daily Show. Apparently, being honest makes you a bad person.
I'm not convinced he's being honest.
His comments are totally out of whack with the electoral reality he's working with day-to-day, and he has to know that. Even he knows that the majority of the people voting Democrat are not on welfare, and that many who vote GOP are. See the federal spending/party affiliation chart I linked above.
In doing what he does, he has to have a much more complex view of things than what he said. What he said is how voters think, it's not how any politician thinks. Leading me to believe that the content was manufactured for the benefit of voters.
Jubbergun wrote:
Romney is also only wrong when he's says "it would be easier if I were Latino" because he's making the mistake of thinking that how people are going to vote should be determined by their race. I think it's goofy to say there was anything wrong with that line when we know that for a lot of people the reason to vote for our current president was his race. I think the Latino vote is going to continue to be split between both parties, much to the benefit of Latinos. If the black vote were up for grabs, you'd see republicans paying more attention to that community's issues. Unfortunately, the black vote overwhelmingly goes to democrats...90%+ in most cases, which leads to republicans having little interest in doing anything for a group that gives them no support.
Blacks don't vote GOP because their ideology makes no sense for them. Blacks know well enough the "turds to gold" philosophy just doesn't work in the real world because unlike whites, having lived in a vacuum, they know what air tastes like.
Jubbergun wrote:
I'm voting for Romney only because I'm not giving President Obama the chance to make any more court appointments. He couldn't be any more of a train wreck than the train wreck I've been watching for the last few years. It's a choice between a douche and a turd sandwich, but I've already picked the lesser evil, so turd sandwich it is.
Of all the reasons one might give to not vote for Obama, this is a pretty damn good one. That said, I still don't agree that Romney is the lesser of the two dbags. He is a thoroughly dishonest and disloyal American, and whether he's serious about his plans or not, his policies will ruin this country. Fluke and company really can't do that.
That said, I'm simply not voting, and even were Romney not stealing the election, it wouldn't make a difference, the status quo is doomed within our lifetime and no one can foresee what will happen next.
I personally believe we are headed for the world of
Soylent Green (to really appreciate what I mean you would have to watch the movie, not just the people eating scene).