Boredalt has expressed his dislike of how I post, and he's generally not in the habit of complimenting people in specific ways. He's also shown a willingness to reopen closed issues weeks later because he's still upset, and he often expresses his dislike for this or that by way of obtuse analysis. Sometimes this takes the form of unrealistic assessments of others strengths or weaknesses to distort context, or various forms of
begging the question.
Dagery's posting style
years ago is way far off the track, and if Boredalt wanted to praise anyone, or talk about a community issue, now or in the past, there are countless more immediate or relevant things that would comet to mind.
It is a lot less likely he chose a really odd, really obscure thing to talk about, that isn't even true (for the reasons I explained), in good faith, than it is because he's doing the same thing he did earlier for the same reasons.
Short of agreeing with my analysis, do you at least understand my reasoning, Max?
Jubbergun wrote:
He discussed someone positively in a manner that made them the relative pinnacle of achievement, and someone got butt hurt that he wasn't that someone. So since someone was butt hurt, it's because Doom was being mean, not because the butt hurt person is thin-skinned and self-absorbed.
Doom = Monotheist
Dooj = Boredalt
That was the intent, yes. Obvious fallacy is, I generally don't care about others' praise or disdain. That being so, it's more likely than not I'm considering the issue objectively.
