Bucket Guild | FUBU BH Forums

I Has a Bucket: Preventing bucket theft on Bleeding Hollow | FUBU: A better BH Forum
It is currently Thu Jul 10, 2025 3:17 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:06 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 7047
Offline

I think the people who are more racist are the ones who think minorities can't get by without affirmative action.

stop babying them, and they will be good enough at what they do to get by on their own merits, not your fucking handouts.


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:36 am  
Blathering Buffoon
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:12 am
Posts: 1152
Offline

Quote:
I think the people who are more racist are the ones who think minorities can't get by without affirmative action.

stop babying them, and they will be good enough at what they do to get by on their own merits, not your fucking handouts.


No one said minorities can't get by without affirmative action.

You didn't address a single thing from my earlier post.


Dvergar /
Quisling
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:38 am  
User avatar

Obama Zombie
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:48 pm
Posts: 3149
Location: NoVA
Offline

Dvergar wrote:
So if he got in through Affirmative Action what exactly would that mean to you? You already don't like him, you were never going to vote for him, you're going to believe whatever shit the right insinuates, what would this change? ... Not to mention IT DOESN'T MATTER BECAUSE HE'S ALREADY THE PRESIDENT, HE'S ALREADY WON.

The President is going to be going for a second term in office so he hasn't already won - he just started campaigning! People aren't trusting of his secrecy in matters which, in my opinion, are trivial from all fronts; when a person can't be trusted that's an issue... and if there is a portion of the country that doesn't trust him for some reason then that reason is a legitimate concern. Remember, we're not talking about 5 people... according to Mayo, we're talking about 25% of the country (which is really 25% of the people polled, but he doesn't know the difference). The effort it'd take to have the POTUS order a subordinate to start the process to release documents X, Y, and Z is minimal I'm sure. Remember at one point the Birth Certificate (long form) wasn't available but miraculously it appeared when it was politically expedient? The same thing could happen with his other records his public is asking for.

Quote:
Do you honestly believe the grades a person gets in school is going to be indicative of their ability as president?

Perhaps. The grades you or I get in college is indicative of our ability to an employeer, is it not? Also, I remember people dogging on both Bush and McCain for their lack-luster performance in school. I think it's racist that we can criticize the white guys to no end, oh but hell naw we can't criticize no black guys. Dat racist.

Quote:
Disagree with his politics all you want but knock it off with the butthurt. The country's in real bad shape and you're feeding right into this pointless shit. And yes, yes it is racist.

USDK has repeatedly said he disagreed with the Presidents politics and that he is not a racist... yet now you're going to call him one? Isn't that feeding the pointless shit?

Oh, and for racism... Blacks (specifically black women) saw an up-tick in reported votes, to which the voting black and minority communities overwhelmingly voted for Obama. Are they all racists because they didn't vote for the white guy?
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:59 am  
User avatar

MegaFaggot 5000
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 11:39 pm
Posts: 4804
Location: Cinci, OH
Offline

Eturnalshift wrote:
Perhaps. The grades you or I get in college is indicative of our ability to an employeer, is it not? Also, I remember people dogging on both Bush and McCain for their lack-luster performance in school. I think it's racist that we can criticize the white guys to no end, oh but hell naw we can't criticize no black guys. Dat racist.

Criticizing someone's academic performance and implying that someone only got where they are today because they're a minority are different animals.


RETIRED.
[armory loc="US,Bleeding Hollow"]Mayonaise[/armory]
[armory loc="US,Bleeding Hollow"]Jerkonaise[/armory]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:18 am  
User avatar

Old Conservative Faggot
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 12:19 am
Posts: 4308
Location: Winchester Virginia
Offline

Mns wrote:
Eturnalshift wrote:
Perhaps. The grades you or I get in college is indicative of our ability to an employeer, is it not? Also, I remember people dogging on both Bush and McCain for their lack-luster performance in school. I think it's racist that we can criticize the white guys to no end, oh but hell naw we can't criticize no black guys. Dat racist.

Criticizing someone's academic performance and implying that someone only got where they are today because they're a minority are different animals.


Maybe, but be honest, all other things being equal, Obama would not have won the Presidency if he wasn't black. You might not like the implication that he's only where he's at because of his race, but leaving aside any speculative bullshit about his college years, there's a lot of truth to that when it comes down to his election.

Your Pal,
Jubber


AKA "The Gun"
AKA "ROFeraL"

World Renowned Mexican Forklift Artiste
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:34 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 7047
Offline

Dvergar wrote:
So if he got in through Affirmative Action what exactly would that mean to you? You already don't like him, you were never going to vote for him, you're going to believe whatever shit the right insinuates, what would this change?


Obama will not win his re-election without the independents. He may not be able to convince the right, but he damned sure better do what he can to convince the independents. If they have a problem with Obama's records, he'll tell them everything they ask so he can stay in.

Quote:
Do you honestly believe the grades a person gets in school is going to be indicative of their ability as president? Not to mention IT DOESN'T MATTER BECAUSE HE'S ALREADY THE PRESIDENT, HE'S ALREADY WON.


He has to get re-elected. Just because we elected an idiot once doesn't mean we have to elect him again or even play nice. Bush was a bad student at Yale his entire two terms as President, don't expect the other side to be any nicer to Obama than the left was to Bush.

Quote:
Disagree with his politics all you want but knock it off with the butthurt. The country's in real bad shape and you're feeding right into this pointless shit. And yes, yes it is racist.


What exactly is racist? I disagree with a person's politics. Just because they're black doesn't mean I'm racist. Would be nice if you could muster up some defense for Obama other than the fact that people disagreeing with him are a bunch of redneck crossburning racists.

Quote:
No one said minorities can't get by without affirmative action.



If that's true, get rid of AA altogether.

Quote:
You didn't address a single thing from my earlier post.


I didn't because i was drunk and wanted to voice an opinion rather than go through bullet points. Hope this meets with your approval!


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:48 am  
User avatar

MegaFaggot 5000
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 11:39 pm
Posts: 4804
Location: Cinci, OH
Offline

Usdk wrote:
Obama will not win his re-election without the independents. He may not be able to convince the right, but he damned sure better do what he can to convince the independents. If they have a problem with Obama's records, he'll tell them everything they ask so he can stay in.

Obama will do fine, considering the Republican party is a massive clusterfuck at the moment and absolutely love shooting themselves in the foot.


RETIRED.
[armory loc="US,Bleeding Hollow"]Mayonaise[/armory]
[armory loc="US,Bleeding Hollow"]Jerkonaise[/armory]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:05 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 7047
Offline

While the republicans are shooting themselves in the foot about as hard as i've seen in my life, I still think obama can't win without the Ind's. The right isn't shooting themselves so hard they're going to help vote obama back in.


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:17 am  
User avatar

Str8 Actin Dude
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 3:33 pm
Posts: 2988
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Offline

I agree that it's insulting to minorities to imply that Affirmative Action is needed, as well as insulting to most white people.

Companies that would hire a less qualified white person over a more qualified minority will only get what's coming to them anyway. Natural selection in the business world.


Brawlsack

Taking an extended hiatus from gaming
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:48 pm  
Blathering Buffoon
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:12 am
Posts: 1152
Offline

Quote:
and if there is a portion of the country that doesn't trust him for some reason then that reason is a legitimate concern.


Which is why the birth certificate was released, the crazies wouldn't stop talking about an issue proven false (by the short form) 3 years ago and instead of doing a modicum of research people just started to believe it. If he did everything some fringe group asked the administration would never be able to do anything (which is the point)

Quote:
Obama would not have won the Presidency if he wasn't black


Wow, you're really out of touch. Did all that rage at our new black president just kind of cloud over your memory? 8 years of a disastrous bush administration, a weak gop candidate with a whack-job unpopular vp candidate, and you think it was because he was black?


Dvergar /
Quisling
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:52 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 6:59 pm
Posts: 2569
Location: In your dreams.
Offline

odd, i thought rats didn't cling to a sinking ship.

did you not hear the distress call of "May Day"?


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 3:06 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 7047
Offline

Dvergar wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
Obama would not have won the Presidency if he wasn't black


Wow, you're really out of touch. Did all that rage at our new black president just kind of cloud over your memory? 8 years of a disastrous bush administration, a weak gop candidate with a whack-job unpopular vp candidate, and you think it was because he was black?



You're only looking at the race between obama and mccain. what jubbs is saying is that obama wouldn't have made it past the primaries.

the republican party was doomed in this last presidential election either way, so the argument obviously refers to the democratic candidate and who would be the one they backed.


EDIT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQSv2WhRuds

if you can get past the parts where palin is interviewed specifically for that film and pay attention to the early part where its hillary vs obama, its pretty interesting. the rest of it is meh.


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 3:19 pm  
Blathering Buffoon
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:12 am
Posts: 1152
Offline

Quote:
You're only looking at the race between obama and mccain. what jubbs is saying is that obama wouldn't have made it past the primaries.


That is equally ridiculous, keep trying.


Dvergar /
Quisling
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 3:26 pm  
User avatar

Deliciously Trashy
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 7:37 pm
Posts: 2695
Location: Seattle
Offline

excellent op-ed from the NYT


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A commentary on birthers from the WSJ:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 3:39 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 7047
Offline

Dvergar wrote:
Quote:
You're only looking at the race between obama and mccain. what jubbs is saying is that obama wouldn't have made it past the primaries.


That is equally ridiculous, keep trying.


How so? Hillary Clinton was the odds on favorite over a no-name from chicago.


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

World of Warcraft phpBB template "WoWMoonclaw" created by MAËVAH (ex-MOONCLAW) (v3.0.8.0) - wowcr.net : World of Warcraft styles & videos
© World of Warcraft and Blizzard Entertainment are trademarks or registered trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. in the U.S. and/or other countries. wowcr.net is in no way associated with Blizzard Entertainment.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group