Bucket Guild | FUBU BH Forums

I Has a Bucket: Preventing bucket theft on Bleeding Hollow | FUBU: A better BH Forum
It is currently Sat Oct 12, 2024 3:28 am



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:36 am  
User avatar

Deliciously Trashy
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 7:37 pm
Posts: 2695
Location: Seattle
Offline

Weena wrote:
Heroin should be legal?


Aren't you a libertarian?


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:38 am  
User avatar

French Faggot
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:15 pm
Posts: 5227
Location: New Jersey
Offline

Aestu wrote:
Weena wrote:
So...Heroin should be legal?


Why is it illegal to do heroin but legal to drink paint?


That's not comparable and you know it. You could have said bleach or drano. You also can't demand a straight answer from Weena after answering his question with a question.

Heroin doesn't kill you right away and gets you high.


If destruction exists, we must destroy everything.
Shuruppak Yuratuhl
Slaad Shrpk Breizh
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:41 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

Yuratuhl wrote:
That's not comparable and you know it. You could have said bleach or drano.


You're right, I could have; I didn't mean anything particular by choosing that particular chemical. More obvious, I suppose.

Yuratuhl wrote:
You also can't demand a straight answer from Weena after answering his question with a question.


A rhetorical question (or an analogy) is a valid response to a question, and I would accept one in turn.

A brick wall of non-comprehension (real or feigned) isn't a valid response. At best, non-comprehension calls for clarification; failing to understand the other side's position doesn't make your own correct.

Yuratuhl wrote:
Heroin doesn't kill you right away and gets you high.


(moving my prior edit down because obviously that's the point)

Drinking paint is legal and doing heroin is not because one feels good and the other doesn't. The fact that both are destructive to mind and body is incidental. Heroin is illegal, not because it is poisonous, but because it is a narcotic.

As much as weed advocates try to confuse or dissemble the issue with hydra-headed BS about "medical marijuana" (opium and meth also have medicinal uses, does that mean they should be legal?) or trying to prove that weed is safe, as if that's the issue (it isn't), or argue that because the enforcement of a law is more difficult than inaction (I'm sure the police would have even less work to do if there were no laws at all), is because all this weed nonsense boils down to one salient fact: there are some people who are just that desperate to do pot.

The silly arguments of potheads are successful at convincing non-potheads because they do not think as potheads do and simply aren't that passionate about the issue; it's why legalization arguments have gained ground. Drugs are not a part of the mainstream world, by virtue of the fact they are illegal. Potheads want to change that, something that can't be allowed because what is really at stake is not individual safety but the legal and social legitimacy of the pothead mentality and lifestyle.


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.


Last edited by Aestu on Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:43 am  
User avatar

Deliciously Trashy
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 7:37 pm
Posts: 2695
Location: Seattle
Offline

If you don't think pot is part of the mainstream..........................


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:50 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

Zaryi wrote:
If you don't think pot is part of the mainstream..........................


Can you buy it off a store shelf? Can you go to work high on pot? Can you go around with a bag of pot in plain sight? Does competition bring production down to cost of materials? Has corporate America refined it and increased its purity and strength to the optimum concentration for maximum sales - how the peace pipe turned into the Marlboro?

Are there all kinds of illegal behaviors that are reasonably mainstream - software/music piracy, for example? Or various forms of fraud and illegal discrimination? Sure. But the fact those behaviors are illegal serves a definite purpose.


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:11 pm  
User avatar

Blathering Buffoon
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:52 pm
Posts: 1083
Offline

Aestu wrote:
Zaryi wrote:
If you don't think pot is part of the mainstream..........................


Can you buy it off a store shelf? Can you go to work high on pot? Can you go around with a bag of pot in plain sight? Does competition bring production down to cost of materials? Has corporate America refined it and increased its purity and strength to the optimum concentration for maximum sales - how the peace pipe turned into the Marlboro?

Are there all kinds of illegal behaviors that are reasonably mainstream - software/music piracy, for example? Or various forms of fraud and illegal discrimination? Sure. But the fact those behaviors are illegal serves a definite purpose.


Actually, every question you asked is true.


Verily, I have often laughed at weaklings who thought themselves proud because they had no claws.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:18 pm  
User avatar

Deliciously Trashy
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 7:37 pm
Posts: 2695
Location: Seattle
Offline

Dotzilla wrote:
Aestu wrote:
Zaryi wrote:
If you don't think pot is part of the mainstream..........................


Can you buy it off a store shelf? Can you go to work high on pot? Can you go around with a bag of pot in plain sight? Does competition bring production down to cost of materials? Has corporate America refined it and increased its purity and strength to the optimum concentration for maximum sales - how the peace pipe turned into the Marlboro?

Are there all kinds of illegal behaviors that are reasonably mainstream - software/music piracy, for example? Or various forms of fraud and illegal discrimination? Sure. But the fact those behaviors are illegal serves a definite purpose.


Actually, every question you asked is true.


Yup, lol.


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:18 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

Dotzilla wrote:
Actually, every question you asked is true.


How much does a bag of weed cost? Is it cheaper than, say, carrots, or potatoes - crops which take much more space, time and effort to grow?

Do restaurants use it like MSG or HFCS - a cheap ingredient with a Midas touch?

As blase as you try to sound, the reality is you can't just walk down the street doing weed, its illegality narrows the scope of its use.

And yes if weed was legal, legitimate professionals with billions of dollars, industrial equipment and credentials would create far more potent delivery than the more or less natural plant being cultivated in an improvised cloche. Don't flatter yourself or what weed as we know it is.

If weed were mainstream this would not even be an argument. The entire reason it is, is because the illegality of weed creates a barrier that wouldn't otherwise be there.


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.


Last edited by Aestu on Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:20 pm  
User avatar

Deliciously Trashy
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 7:37 pm
Posts: 2695
Location: Seattle
Offline

Aestu wrote:
Dotzilla wrote:
Actually, every question you asked is true.


As blase as you try to sound, the reality is you can't just walk down the street doing weed, its illegality narrows the scope of its use.


Oh, you can. And people do.

and really, OH MAN RESTAURANTS DON'T USE IT LIKE MSG OR HFCS SO IT AIN'T MAINSTREAM. Dat hyperbole.


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:21 pm  
User avatar

Deliciously Trashy
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 7:37 pm
Posts: 2695
Location: Seattle
Offline

I can't answer the other question because I don't smoke.


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:25 pm  
User avatar

Blathering Buffoon
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:52 pm
Posts: 1083
Offline

Marijuana is more expensive because it is not FDA approved, like potatoes are, therefore cannot be lobbied. The increased funding goes towards extremely comprehensive hydroponic and indoor growing facilities. There is a ludicrous amount of botanical and biological science going into increasing the THC yield per plant. And yes, in Colorado, Washington, and DC you can use cannabis in public while still obeying the same rules tobacco users must abide by.


Verily, I have often laughed at weaklings who thought themselves proud because they had no claws.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:25 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

Dotzilla wrote:
Marijuana is more expensive because it is not FDA approved, like potatoes are, therefore cannot be lobbied. The increased funding goes towards extremely comprehensive hydroponic and indoor growing facilities.


Silly argument. FDA approval COSTS money.

You obviously know nothing about agriculture. The potatoes you buy at the store aren't grown hydroponically; hydroponics is a niche. The reason agricultural subsides are such a big deal is because farming crops is inherently difficult and labor-intensive work.

Weed, on the other hand...is a weed. Not because it's narcotic, but because of the nature of the plant itself.

Dotzilla wrote:
There is a ludicrous amount of botanical and biological science going into increasing the THC yield per plant.


Like I said - don't flatter your amateurs you're on the level of the experts employed by the tobacco companies or pharmaceutical firms. What you are cooking up is still more like the natural plant than unlike it. Going back to the agricultural example, compare store-bought tomatoes or carrots today versus the tomatoes or carrots available even half a century ago.

Zaryi wrote:
and really, OH MAN RESTAURANTS DON'T USE IT LIKE MSG OR HFCS SO IT AIN'T MAINSTREAM. Dat hyperbole.


It isn't hyperbole at all. Why do restaurants use MSG and HFCS? Because they are ingredients that are cheap to produce in vast quantities and make crappy food palatable. Weed is just that - a weed - it grows quickly and almost anywhere, and conveys strong narcotic gratification with no downside.

I am not saying that crappy restaurants using weed as a filler would be bad because it would be a detriment to food quality or whatever. I'm simply pointing out that if weed were legal, it would become incredibly ubiquitous in a way it is not now, something that would be grossly destructive.


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:33 pm  
User avatar

Deliciously Trashy
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 7:37 pm
Posts: 2695
Location: Seattle
Offline

You really have no idea what you're talking about :|


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:35 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

Zaryi wrote:
You really have no idea what you're talking about :|


In what respect? Why don't you take a swing at the analogy with MSG/HFCS, then? How does the analogy reveal my lack of understanding of weed?


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CNN tests drivers after smoking up to 1 Gram of weed
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:04 pm  
User avatar

Old Conservative Faggot
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 12:19 am
Posts: 4308
Location: Winchester Virginia
Offline

Aestu wrote:
Battletard wrote:
Ancient imaginary Greek niggaz did drugs in peaceful apathy so we can't let that happen in America. If it happened in a made up dead religion thousands of years ago it could happen in modern day America too.


It's arrogant and bigoted to write something off just because it's foreign, different or old.


I think it has more to do with the "imaginary" part than the foreign, different, and old parts.

Aestu wrote:
Just because the gods are characters in the story in question doesn't mean it's a religious work, or that religion has anything to do with it. Just because a story, idea or way of thinking happens to have religious overtones is no good reason to dismiss it. Religion, like every other aspect of culture, is an adaptation to the conditions of life - and a mostly effective one.

Whether the isle was real or not is irrelevant. Just because the story is old doesn't mean it's wrong; on the contrary, it's something that has stood the test of time. I could give the more recent (and factual) example of the events leading up to the Opium War. Aesop's Fables are pure fiction but we consider them valid as ever, so why haggle over the factual rectitude of this story or any other ancient tale?


Coming from someone who likes to lecture everyone about how the "world has always worked" and denigrates others for believing in a fictional "view of the past" based on secondary sources and not actual fact, this is a facetious and self-serving answer that is little more than a pathetic attempt to push the spotlight off the holes in your argument...not that anyone needs a spotlight to see holes that size.

Pot does make people stupid and lazy. If you smoke it and you're still productive and useful, good for you...if you really are productive and useful. I'm watching someone ruin their life with it right now. It's not the only thing screwing them up, but it's a huge contributing factor. It's ruining that person's relationships with their friends. It affects their work and their attitude at and about work, and I wouldn't be surprised to see them lose their job in the near future. The biggest problem is that they're completely delusional about how things are and even when you bluntly tell them what they're doing it goes in one ear and out the other.

People who are intent on destroying their lives are going to find a way to do it no matter what kind of roadblocks you throw in front of them. It would probably be better in the long run to just let them do it instead of creating a regulatory system to stop them from doing it that creates a black market that encourages violent criminal enterprise. I'm not saying we should grease the skids so those self-destructive people can launch themselves into oblivion, but legalizing cannabis (and possibly other illegal drugs) would create a safer regulatory environment that would take the criminal element out of the equation. This would probably also make a lot of these drugs cheaper and provide a new tax base--a tax base that could be used to encourage and fund treatment for people to get off those same drugs.

I also believe that part of the allure of drugs for some people is that they're illegal. There's a lot of "rebel without a clue" types that do things just because they're told they shouldn't. Giving them permission to do something lessens their interest in doing it.

Cannabis is bad, but it's no worse than other substances we freely allow the public to access. Legalize it and then put it under the same ridiculous tax and regulatory schemes as alcohol and tobacco and the problem won't go away, but situation will improve.

Zaryi wrote:
You really have no idea what you're talking about :|


You know Aestu isn't going to let a little thing like that stand in his way.

Your Pal,
Jubber


AKA "The Gun"
AKA "ROFeraL"

World Renowned Mexican Forklift Artiste
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

World of Warcraft phpBB template "WoWMoonclaw" created by MAËVAH (ex-MOONCLAW) (v3.0.8.0) - wowcr.net : World of Warcraft styles & videos
© World of Warcraft and Blizzard Entertainment are trademarks or registered trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. in the U.S. and/or other countries. wowcr.net is in no way associated with Blizzard Entertainment.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group