Jubbergun wrote:
Jezebel is a terrible fucking site and the sort of venom that it injects into decent women like Zaryi (and some of my other friends) is honestly hurtful to their attitudes toward others, especially men. Sadly, that seems to be the objective of those who run and/or contribute to the site.
The fact that they choose to name the site after an unequivocally evil figure speaks volumes. Of course, this also holds true of the Cato Institute.
The funny thing is, "otherwise decent" women like Zaryi think they are on "the upper hand", but in reality, they are just being used as tools by the evil lesbian feminazis who write this crap.
Have you ever wondered why the dominant personalities of the feminist movement are people like Lagarde and Fluke? Never mainstream personalities - short of being heterosexual, at least people who are decently able to integrate their sexuality into their life short of dressing and gesticulating like men and orienting every aspect of their life around their alternative sexuality?
I've met these kinds of people. They have no real respect for anyone - male or female - and they regard heterosexual attraction with a combination of jealously and disgust only seen in Catholic nuns. Many of them are not truly lesbian, merely angry, frustrated, insecure women with severe penis envy. A surprising number even change their surnames, as nothing more than a statement of the profundity of their hostility towards all in the world that is not them.
These evil lesbian feminazis - people like Lagarde and Fluke - are the ones driving this train to nowhere.
Don't forget - until the feminists turned into feminazis back in the early 90s - when like every progressive movement, once their legitimate goals were achieved, the hardcore had to turn radical to stay relevant - consumerism was the
enemy.
These very same people in the flesh once plotted to bomb the very stores they are now lobbying for.
These lesbians see hetero women as useful idiots. Nothing more. They are more than happy to invent rationalizations for them to buy into the consumerism oriented at the male sex drive they despise - glamour gear and Prada purses, video games and online dating - so long as doing so builds a platform for them to spit their vitriol from.
They do not care that they are making mainstream women believe lies.
They do not care that they are selling out their future by feeding them unrealistic expectations.
They do not care that they are endangering their long-term health by overprescribing meds.
They do not care that they are setting them up for a life of frustration and self-loathing.
They do not care that they are sowing the seeds of bitter alienation against all good men and women.
They do not care that they are driving them even deeper into debt than the men they turn them against.
They do not care that they are breeding them into a most precarious state of dependency.
The closest parallel is Indian gaming. Supposedly, the marketing of sin exists to better the lot of the Native Americans. In practice, it does nothing of the sort. The only ones who really cash in on the lucrative gaming contracts are the politically connected chiefs who hate their own people no less than they do whites. As for the natives themselves, Indian gaming only leads them further down the road to nowhere - down the road of vice and eternal dependency.
The same dynamic holds true for feminism.
There are the useful idiots, and there are the fat cats collecting fares on the train to nowhere.
