Usdk wrote:
Tehra wrote:
the leaked information was previously offered to the WH for review.
there was no reply.
in the WH, the copyright "czar" has ties to Righthaven, a firm that makes its profit off of buying copyrights and suing people who post the material, for example, reposting of news articles.
they sue, settle out of court, then look for something else to sue you for. aka, copyright trolls.
if you can't see why these two things are linked, you're blind.
So a division of people in the white house leaked a bunch of stuff that 1) makes our leadership/military look stupid, 2) may jeapordize the safety of our fighting men and women in the field and 3) is bound to boost morale of the people we're fighting if not turn even MORE against us so that they can make a quick buck in a settlement?
I really don't want to believe it, but I also have such a lack of faith in humanity that I really can't deny it.
By allowing this to leak, you allow the public to have your same reaction. Except, it's supposed to be towards wikileaks. It's supposed to tarnish something that could be valuable in a free world. Also note that this comes after the embarrassment from that fired General.
Now, if there's now 7 people in the world that have "keys" to shut down the internet, copyright trolls with connections to politicians milking bloggers and forums for their non-existent money, and an increasing desire to squelch the truth (or even discussion of news), no matter how ugly or inconvenient...
bye-bye miss american pie.