Boredalt wrote:
Crush individuality with dress codes, uniforms, and military-style marching classes and discipline. The lash and medication for those who dare think outside the box! How has this system worked out for you?
I oppose medication and corporal punishment. I believe dress codes and uniforms promote individuality by encouraging people to see themselves outside socially imposed labels. I dress plainly for this very reason. I don't need clothes to tell me who I am, I am who I am.
False choices constrict freedom. No man is an island, and part of the reality - and unfreedom - of school is peer pressure.
Standardized tests test what is to be taught, which is what is on the test. The premise of teaching non-test material is that the classroom is to be a comprehensive life experience, and it's not supposed to be. Again, too bad some people are shitty parents and can't give their kids a life experience outside TV. Don't make that teachers' problem.
Teachers don't want to be creative, and they shouldn't have to be. "Creative" curriculum really means just replacing the arbitrary, but fixed and knowable, criteria of a test, with the whims of some pedagogue, however right or wrong he may be.
The best educational systems are the least creative, and that's a good thing. It isn't possible to be creative in a pedagogical capacity because any pedagogic creativity necessarily imposing one's creativity and thus telling the student what to believe. Children cannot evaluate values independently, that's why they're children, and that's why colleges are, or are supposed to be, the place where that happens.
This is why literature is, or ought to be, taught in middle/high school - to give children a well-rounded background to evaluate values against a broad backdrop, independent of "creativity".