Azelma wrote:
However, we don't live in a perfect world, and will never live in a perfect world. Therefore believing that anyone who chooses to use their talents elsewhere is "wasting them" is silly.
You're also speaking in absolutes, and ignoring the fact that really smart people with many other abilities exist.
This is a complete and total projection.
It is you that draws this absolute distinction between "socialist utopia" and "oh well everything is shit and that won't change".
I am illustrating that it is not a choice between absolutes at all, but between many worlds that existed in the past and infinitely more that may exist into the future.
It is you that writes off my view as "you work in politics or science or you're mud".
Are you seriously contending, therefore, that I think every SEAL candidate should run for senator or go into R&D? No; my argument is eminently the opposite of absolutes - it is contemplating the many alternatives to the status quo. Same goes for business - I want to go into business one day because my appreciation for its productive potential is not an absolute - I understand the limitations that must be imposed.
When JFK talked about the "famine of ideas", "moral strength", and "lack of historic purpose", this is what he meant - the incredible narrowness of mind that regards the status quo vs utopia as absolutes.
Quote:
I wouldn't judge such a person as being useless to society because they preferred to pursue excellence in a field that doesn't necessarily shape the world.
People who exist only to blow up people and places that have no bearing on our lives and get by on military welfare are useless to society.
Are they making our lives better? Do they add to the worth of our society? You tell me.