Bucket Guild | FUBU BH Forums

I Has a Bucket: Preventing bucket theft on Bleeding Hollow | FUBU: A better BH Forum
It is currently Mon Apr 21, 2025 4:46 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: COICA
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:25 am  
User avatar

Fat Bottomed Faggot
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:53 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Minnesota
Offline

Demonoid wrote:
In the United States, a new law proposal called The Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) was introduced last week, and there will be a hearing in front of the Judiciary Committee this Thursday.

If passed, this law will allow the government, under the command of the media copanies, to censor the internet as they see fit, like China and Iran do, with the difference that the sites they decide to censor will be completely removed form the internet and not just in the US.


Full Bill Information Here

As internet users, I thought you should be aware.

Also, you should sign this.

On a related matter as well, here's an article that looks at 'copyright infringement' in a much different manner.


"Ok we aren't such things and birds are pretty advanced. They fly and shit from anywhere they want. While we sit on our automatic toilets, they're shitting on people and my car while a cool breeze tickles their anus. That's the life."
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:38 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 8:41 am
Posts: 4695
Offline

Admittedly, I'm a bit of a pessimist when it comes to corporations/government/society. That being said, the idea of a "free" and "completely open" internet is a pipe dream.

We can sign petitions, make a big stink, but I seriously doubt we will be able to stop the inevitable.
-----------------------------------------------------

Corporations (Comcast, Verizon, TimeWarner, etc..and yes, even Google) want control of the internet more than anything in the entire world.

Compounding this is the fact that we can also stream movies, television shows, and music, etc.. (so now these corporations who have cable TV/production companies/ HD etc offerings are threatened another way).

This is just another manifestation of this desire. The corporations/government have all the money and power, so rest assured, there will never be a free internet. They will impose download limits, and charge you for differing speeds and data transfer amounts.

They will block web sites (or remove them completely) that "violate" copyright laws, or infringe upon anything.


Rest assured my friends, these billion dollar companies will protect their revenue streams at all costs - especially at the cost of consumer freedom :)


Azelma

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:40 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 7047
Offline

what a fuck knuckle.


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:41 am  
User avatar

Old Conservative Faggot
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 12:19 am
Posts: 4308
Location: Winchester Virginia
Offline

I don't do "inevitable." I signed it.

I'd call/write my senator/congressman, but it'd be easier just to remove them when November rolls around. AMIRITE?

Your Pal,
Jubber


AKA "The Gun"
AKA "ROFeraL"

World Renowned Mexican Forklift Artiste
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:12 pm  
User avatar

Pinheaded Pissant
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:29 pm
Posts: 1515
Location: Boston, MA
Offline

I will do what I can to fight against such a bill being signed, but even if it were it would never, and I mean NEVER withstand even a basic judicial scrutiny.

They can arrest you for breaking the law online, but they can't prevent you from publishing a website where such acts might happen nor can they prevent you from reading it.

And as far as banishing something from the internet... well.. .the internet doesn't really work that way. For one, sites hosted in foreign countries they can't do dickshit about except ask the host country to do something about it, and even if they try it would be pretty much impossible to keep someone from just putting up the site again.

Take Wikileaks for example. That site wants to stay open, and it is so decentralized that it will.

In fact, I don't doubt that this is an attempt to do something about Wikileaks....


Image

Akina: bitch I will stab you in the face
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:10 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

I read the bill.

It addresses a real and pressing problem - piracy - that does need to be combatted. The bill itself is pretty narrow in scope and most of the claims about it are hyperbole. In effect, it really doesn't change the status quo, that copyright owners have a legal right to pursue an injunction against violators, except to provide a modus operandi in the electronic realm.

The problem with the bill is that it appears overly in favor of big companies that can play the legal game and can aggressively submit and sustain lawsuits, especially Section 3 which basically seems to treat the Justice Dept as a clearinghouse for their whims.

That said, the bill is necessary - in some form - and the debate should not be whether such a law should be implemented but how it can be implemented in a fair and accessible way.

In any event, I doubt it would survive a constitutional challenge.


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:43 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 8:41 am
Posts: 4695
Offline

Aestu wrote:
It addresses a real and pressing problem - piracy - that does need to be combatted.


Ye ain't a pirate, eh???


Azelma

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:00 pm  
User avatar

Pinheaded Pissant
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:29 pm
Posts: 1515
Location: Boston, MA
Offline

Piracy is an issue, but the solution is not to address the symptom but to address the problem causing it. Shutting down these websites will not stop people from file sharing any more than shutting down Napster did.

So long as people feel it is more worthwhile to go through the trouble of finding and downloading a pirated copy of something than it is to buy it legitimately, they will do so. Ultimately, the solution will have to come from tipping that balance.

It's not impossible to do. If companies made it easier to get to their content legitimately than it is to get to it illegitimately, and offered the content for the actual market price (what people are actually willing to pay for it), then the problem would mostly go away.

But so long as would-be customers have to jump through hoops to pay too much for your product, they won't.

To wit, I prefer to buy music from Amazon than to torrent it. I can be sure of the quality, that it doesn't skip, I get the files as mp3s and don't have to struggle with a non-standard file type, and Amazon is easy to search and has 1-click purchasing. I wouldn't mind it being a little cheaper and I could see the price being a problem for someone with less disposable income, but it's a good example of how to address the problem.

ITunes, on the other hand, I would never buy music from. I don't want to deal with their proprietary file types.


Image

Akina: bitch I will stab you in the face
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:21 pm  
User avatar

French Faggot
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:15 pm
Posts: 5227
Location: New Jersey
Offline

bill is fucked, and even if it somehow gets through (it won't) some panel of judges somewhere is going to rape it without remorse.


If destruction exists, we must destroy everything.
Shuruppak Yuratuhl
Slaad Shrpk Breizh
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:34 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

dek wrote:
Piracy is an issue, but the solution is not to address the symptom but to address the problem causing it. Shutting down these websites will not stop people from file sharing any more than shutting down Napster did.

So long as people feel it is more worthwhile to go through the trouble of finding and downloading a pirated copy of something than it is to buy it legitimately, they will do so. Ultimately, the solution will have to come from tipping that balance.

It's not impossible to do. If companies made it easier to get to their content legitimately than it is to get to it illegitimately, and offered the content for the actual market price (what people are actually willing to pay for it), then the problem would mostly go away.

But so long as would-be customers have to jump through hoops to pay too much for your product, they won't.

To wit, I prefer to buy music from Amazon than to torrent it. I can be sure of the quality, that it doesn't skip, I get the files as mp3s and don't have to struggle with a non-standard file type, and Amazon is easy to search and has 1-click purchasing. I wouldn't mind it being a little cheaper and I could see the price being a problem for someone with less disposable income, but it's a good example of how to address the problem.

ITunes, on the other hand, I would never buy music from. I don't want to deal with their proprietary file types.


False corrolary; people being willing to steal something they don't need doesn't prove the price is too high, only that the product is desirable and security is low.


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:59 pm  
User avatar

Feckless Fool
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 7:46 am
Posts: 1459
Location: canadianaville
Offline

Didnt the last time the FBI try to crackdown on illegal download stuff 4chan crashed their servers?


I am THE man.
http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee15 ... 171424.jpg

Fantastique wrote:
I love you.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:45 pm  
User avatar

Fat Bottomed Faggot
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:53 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Minnesota
Offline

I torrent everything. Everything I have has been stolen.

Unlike some, I give a shit about the bands I listen to. I do buy CD's I really like. Bout once every few months I look at the bands I've been listening to, and then list them by their rank on Amazon. I buy stuff from the lowest ranked bands first and then move up to higher ranked stuff.

I have to admit, being a poor ass, I usually only get through about 80% of the list. Hence the starting with the less money making bands first, as they need the most help.

-/-/-/-/-
TL:DR
I use piracy as a way of "trying before buying".


"Ok we aren't such things and birds are pretty advanced. They fly and shit from anywhere they want. While we sit on our automatic toilets, they're shitting on people and my car while a cool breeze tickles their anus. That's the life."
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 10:21 pm  
User avatar

MegaFaggot 5000
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 11:39 pm
Posts: 4804
Location: Cinci, OH
Offline

I personally feel that one of the main reasons of a lot of pirating, especially games and movies, is because the price has increased and the quality has decreased. With the sea of shit that's been pouring out of the movie theaters and video game markets, I've become much more apprehensive about investing $15 or $40-60 smackers for something that, for all I know, will be a complete waste of time and effort.

I suppose it's always been like this for movies, but I really can't feel bad for assholes like Activision, who hiked the price of the PC version of one of their CoD games (I think it was the newest one) in order to "cover costs of piracy". I'm pretty sure the last time I saw a demo for a game was in the early 00's and I'm beyond tired of the crapshoot of buying a game on what someone else says.

I usually end up pirating games first but if I thoroughly enjoy them, I'll buy them.

If anything, I feel its a lot like what's happening with other businesses in the country, where people are getting smarter and are refusing to pay premium price for shitty product. I look at the clusterfuck of Activision trying to milk money out of everyone and then I look at companies like Valve, which seem to be flourishing because they listen to their fanbase, make great games, and reward their fans (ex. TF2 Community hats, continued DLC support for L4D, etc).

TL;DR - If companies actually gave a shit about their product, there'd be a lot less piracy than there is now.


RETIRED.
[armory loc="US,Bleeding Hollow"]Mayonaise[/armory]
[armory loc="US,Bleeding Hollow"]Jerkonaise[/armory]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 10:24 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 6:59 pm
Posts: 2569
Location: In your dreams.
Offline

"ship it, we'll patch it later"


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 10:32 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 7047
Offline

Mns wrote:
"cover costs of piracy"


Lol penalizing the honest people because there are dishonest people, lol fuck you activision.

but yeah, thats why i like valve.

Quote:
people being willing to steal something they don't need doesn't prove the price is too high, only that the product is desirable and security is low.


No, people steal because they aren't willing to pay as much as businesses ask for the shit the entertainment industry has been pumping out lately. When is the last time a game as great as say....Portal was released?

Not to mention stealing things that are no longer in print, like old snes games.


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

World of Warcraft phpBB template "WoWMoonclaw" created by MAËVAH (ex-MOONCLAW) (v3.0.8.0) - wowcr.net : World of Warcraft styles & videos
© World of Warcraft and Blizzard Entertainment are trademarks or registered trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. in the U.S. and/or other countries. wowcr.net is in no way associated with Blizzard Entertainment.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group