rikkilake wrote:
cziiki wrote:
For example, Dvergar I assume you love cake/pie. Now if every day for the rest of a 2 month period I fed you pie, to be specific Apple Pie/German Chocolate Cake (for irony reasons), your general interest in such pie/cake would diminish over time assuming that all pie/cake giving is near identical. What i was originally proposing is the idea that the topic is over covered and over emphasized which draws attention away from how such an event in important in modern history.
your analogy sucks
cake/pie would be history as a topic
apple pie/german cake would be specific parts in history (WWII, for example)
not teaching the holocaust in a WWII course would be the equivalent to deciding that not every ingredient in a cake would be necessary. i mean, i don't want to eat flour by itself, so i'll leave that out. additionally, i would rather just eat a lot of chocolate instead of crust in general. i mean, that would be me ignoring what i don't want and instead focusing on things that do please me, however, i'm no longer eating cake and am instead just sticking my finger in the can of frosting
Rikki, I am not advocating the removal of the teaching of the Holocaust in a WWII class, but more advocating the idea of teaching it differently and offering opposing view points as to better understand how such and event happened. Seeing as most courses merely attempt to be all like "BOOM and then the Holocaust happened", when it was caused by the end of WWI and the Treaty of Versailles and such. I'm just suggesting teaching it differently and with more clarity into generally uncovered areas, such as the persecution of homosexuals, gypsies, artists, musicians and such.
Also, I would much rather sometimes just eat the frosting of a cake than the cake itself....or the filling of a pie than the pie itself.