Bucket Guild | FUBU BH Forums

And here you are, making insults at my age now, when I've spoken about what was done, why I did it, and the actions I feel that are unjustified and that need correcting to begin with, not just from me but from the moderators that edited and banned me. You're beginning to fulfill the post I created about my stance on Fubu'rs atm. You're just saying shit to say it atm, whereas my points have substance atm because a post was edited but edited as a personal attack.

Instead of editing and instructing why the edit was made, a fat joke is made. It's unjustifiable.

Everything I've said has had reason involved.

See, you're reading what you want to read. Reread the ban reason.



No, you threw a temper tantrum. That's unprecedented. The editing of posts on this forum is not, neither is changing the content of a useless post.

You got exactly what you did to dozens of people for 2 hours right back at you and you're whining.





Your deductive reasoning when the person just says "r u srs?" leaving you to your own paranoid delusions.

You've proven yourself to be exactly what you hate.



Yeah, it was wrong for the post to be edited in the way it was. It was too kind. The people of this forum thought your behavior was uncalled for and made fun of you. You got butthurt. You responded with a "QQQQQQQQQ" post and demand that your posts have substance and need every aspect read and acknowledged. Do you note the irony of a hypocrite whining about standards?

I do. Go rage about it into your pillow, again.

Okay, if we are going to disect each other statement's lets do it then. Even though none of this really is making sense to you, I will explain where I was wrong, where you are wrong, and where the moderators were wrong.


Here is what happened, yet again, because I feel it needs repeating since you are trying to assist me with understanding why I am completely wrong.

Baneleaf makes post about Christmas morning and about how people hate me and why I am hated for doing such things.

I make a picture post response about the event, nothing else is added.

Aestu adds a "LOL UR UI IS HORRID" comment.

Someone else agrees.

I make a simple comment about how a lot of people's UIs may be hated by a lot of people, druid comes in to make another smart ass remark about how easy it is to have a good UI with a massive icon in the center of the screen. I spam QQQQQQQQQQQQ.





.....





Moderator steps in to edit my post. Calls me fat with the edit and says a snooty remark.

(Meanwhile, I have no idea that my QQQQQQ was scrolling across the web browser)

I take offense to not the moderated post, but the way in which it was done. Instead of being rational and polite, I instead went on a 45 minute spam spree.

Why did I do this you might ask? Because I felt the first edit was improper. Atleast the way it was handled. Instead of saying "Post edited by Yuratuhl. (Reason: Stop spamming QQs in chain succession, it creates a wide post (browser issues))" I get a fat joke and a really negative post made. I feel now that an edit was warranted, but the execution of the edit was highly improper.



Now to address how you, the FUBU forum reader takes what I've said.



The ban reason was indefinite till I was proving that I am not a"5 year old". Later, the same moderator states that all first-time bans are 1 hour. I stated that my ban was not for one hour, it was indefinite till I made effort to provide reason for no need for a ban.

There isn't any reading into it for what I want it to be. I was banned for longer than an hour. First time offense, banned longer than an hour. Longer than 3 hours. It has gone on for 3 days now and supposedly it was lifted.



In retrospect, yes. I did. I did it because I was treated like shit instead of simply being told a reasonable explanation as to why I was edited and the proper way to make a post. Previously to the post, I had no idea it was a long strain. I figured it would break on its own but it did not. This was the reason for the edit, but the reason for anger developed from the execution of the edit. Moderators are supposed to keep these forums fun, and if that includes editing, it should be reasonably explainable to the person as to why the edit was made instead of throwing personal insults out there.

That is why I went on a tantrum, as you call it, even though I was laughing while I did it. I felt like there should be a legit reason for edits, and spamming is one of them in my book.



Room for interpretation allows room for misinterpretation. If you can't understand that, then you're hopeless.



I admitted the post needed editing. Your sarcasm, while noted, doesn't advance this thread further if you continue with it. Butthurt is incorrect. I felt insulted, because I have beliefs about moderators. If they are there to help moderate a forum for the sake of keeping it fun and clean, it should be that way for everything and everyone. No one individual should be singled out just because they can and have the ability to do so. If there is a legit reason to edit, do it. Do it without the need to insult though, because as I said, if you insult, you provoke further insults. It makes sense if you have a reason to edit, but lacks sense if you do it for the fun of it.

My QQQQQQQQ post was an adequate response for the reactions involving the posting of a picture, only for the sake of showing the event in question, not the UI of the picture.

If someone takes a picture of the Washington Monument with a white cloud in the sky, and the reason you show the picture to someone is because you're discussing the Washington monument, you don't stop to say, WOW THAT IS A FUCKED UP CLOUD, and ONLY talk about the cloud, unless if you have ADD or you're lacking substance to say anything about the original reason for someone showing you the picture.

Sure, let us play.

"Here is what happened, yet again, because I feel it needs repeating since you are trying to assist me with understanding why I am completely wrong."

Those are your words, which I shall use against you.



Absence of liking you doesn't mean people hate you. People just really don't like you. "Such things" involve things people find annoying, things you tend to do.



Nothing except a second picture showing more of it 7 minutes later. I mean, who takes 7 minutes to upload a second image from their netbook?



He also posted


but that doesn't fit your M.O. for your "Woe is Me" thread, does it?



Yep, that was me. Glad you're paying attention.



That's Rathmoon, of Resto Druid PvP fame:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1cX6LnMhYM[/youtube]

But we didn't expect you to know this, did we? It's not like you're on a forum for a little over a month and have written some sort of psychoanalysis thread concerning the posting habits of people here for 6 months longer than you or anything. Not like you're preaching how a forum should work to people who have been posting on it for longer.

Oh, right, those threads. Your ignorance is further evidenced later in your last post:



You're starting to drool a bit on the keys and managed to type up some diatribe about how people are supposed to post in your perfect world of paddywack and pals, and I can't stop laughing about it.

Stop trying to go on a righteous crusade while you feign admitting fault. You've lost a shitton of credibility on this forum, even from people who gave you a chance. Admit fault and stop trying to be the martyr, or one day you'll wake up burning.


I'd touch upon the drivel in the center of your post, but



PS: I'm not the only one who called it a tantrum, and I assure you, I know you weren't laughing.

I've only repeated myself so many times, I really don't know what else I can say.

A lot of your things are picking at details, for example, 7 minutes to upload a picture. Big deal? I uploaded it and posted it. It means nothing more than a picture and you're reading too much into it.

Also, Aestu assumed I was trying to act cool. You are too. This is where you're wrong. Those pictures were posted for two reasons. Firstly, I had a lot of people ask me for links to the screenshots that I took, and instead, I mailed them non-UI photos of the event. Secondly, I posted it because it was relavent to Baneleaf's post.

Aestu made a UI comment. Not his original comment. If he had said that in place of a UI issue in a topic about the event in question, there would be no drivel.

Thank you for clarifying that you agreed about your disliking my UI, but you realize, in a thread about the event, my UI has no relation to the event. It is merely included in a photo for others to see what happened. Again, as I mentioned, I was watching House. You make it seem like people need to be talking instantly to be on point, some people multitask.

You're cute though.

I honestly don't think you understand what happened because you choose not to want to think about it.

This issue began because



If you don't understand that, then everything else you're trying to push in this thread isn't going to make sense to you. I was provoked, by Aestu, by you, and then a moderator.

The only difference was the Moderator had a reason to edit my post and did so but without regard to explaining why it was done as to prevent it in the future. Your reason for posting was for nothing more than a follow up of Aestu's remark about my UI, which again... HAD NO RELEVANCE TO THE OP (/smash head on keyboard) ... If you do not understand this, o m f g.

and yet, still banned. I see this is a one hour ban, really, I do. (Bending Time and Space)

Considering that I haven't been able to post for ~4 days now, I would still have to agree with the fact that though Tehra is trying to say my ban is temporary, it isn't. Mns states it is one hour, and it isn't. Tehra, here's a screenshot since you can't seem to believe me.

It means one picture wasn't enough and you came back 7 minutes later and posted another, much like most of your posts where you post something, then edit it 3-4 times in a 20 minute span after posting.



I'm sure if you have 5 people on this forum post to corroborate your "lot of people" your ban would be lifted immediately.

Yes, it was relevant to Baneleaf's post, posting just an image, followed by another image, without any commentary, reinforced it.



Perfect-posting people posting prominent points that please poor poor Paddywack.



See:



As I said, glad you're paying attention. You can focus on your UI all you want, you just look like a broken record.



Watching House, laughing, it doesn't matter how you cite it, you actually spent that much time and effort to spam a forum you decry as unfair after using it however you prefer.



Thanks, you're not. You can have your cake, but you probably shouldn't eat it too.

Knick knack, paddywack, give that dog a 4 day old bone.



It's been 34 hours.

Quickest breakdown from non-access on record. It's almost unprecedented.

My ban wasnt for posting the pics, it was for spamming. An indefinite ban for spamming? First time too?

People that were in the photos were the ones asking to see them, I mailed them better pics without the UI but I sent them the weblink of the forum that these other ones with them all shouting Merry Christmas were in here, also to bring them to the forum.

I wasn't the one focusing on my UI, you and Aestu were, but I am glad you know the English language. So very, very well you do. You fail to understand that you split a thread for the sake of your own pleasure, you follow someone else because you are their thread-slut. You cannot accept the simple fact that your post, while existing because you're able to make it possible, doesn't make it anything near on-topic with the original post.

After this, I don't think I am going to continue to reply to your points, you have a few good ones but you're derailing yourself and you're playing ignorant. You cannot admit that you provoked a split thread by following Aestu's footsteps, and that's your problem, not mine. You're doing that in a lot of threads and you're trying to do it here now.

Egh, feels like four. W/e, so it's coming up to a second day. The point remains that it is still past one hour, not to mention there was no warning, but just a ban.

You are partaking in a debate, where you agree with getting banned before being warned, when others get warned and then banned. You're looking to hard to find faults at the moment, and yes, you're correct. It is coming up on the second day, but you're promoting the idea of banning before warning.

I wasn't warned and I was provoked. You don't agree with it, so leave it be then, you've made your points, as obscure as they are.

Argue about the amount of time I've said incorrectly, but you cannot argue with this



Thread locks AND warnings.

Was I given a thread lock? Yes. Was it my thread? No.

Was I given a warning? No

Rack up enough of these (thread locks and warnings)... I can only assume that you mean that I have to be crossing the FUBU rules multiple times, right?

Was I doing two offenses? No





---> Forum board agrees to these rules. I was given no warning. I was given a lock, I made no subsequent threads of spam. I was given a ban.





Everything you are arguing with me about is ancillary.





Again, I was given no warning. I was given a lock. Only one thread lock that wasn't even my thread. I have made no subsequent abuse of spamming. I was not given a second anything. I was voted to be banned.




You are all giving bullshit as much as you stand by it.

The way I see it, mid spam, Zaryi should have WARNED me that I was getting a thread lock, but didn't.

It was locked pre-ban.

I made a second thread stating I did it for laughs.

In that thread, MNS makes the read-only ban effective.

Everything you voted for and agreed to has been bullshit.

I was given NO warning to stop, NO warning that a thread lock was imminent, and NO warning for a ban. I didn't even come close to a two strikes rule, so it would seem.

Everything is personal with MNS here and whoever else that voted for my ban.

Which leads me back to this, anyone who agrees with the ban is full of shit for agreeing to rules that you want to apply to the forum board, because you sure as hell aren't doing that right now. Mods that voted for the ban included.

Further proof that this is personal







Honestly, none of you going to are going to say anything because it is funny to you, but if you were in this spot light, which you may never be in, but you are saying that if you were, you wouldn't see this as a problem at all.

Your moderators are not loyal to the rules everyone agreed to before I was here.

Why?

I woke up, checked FUBU on my phone, saw the spam and locked it. Absolutely no reason to warn you that a thread lock was impending.