Jubbergun wrote:
There are plenty of non-caucasian disabled people from broken homes setting a good example. It's amazing what happens when people refuse to see themselves as disadvantaged victims and just do what they want.
I don't deny there are many pathetic moochers.
The other day I was browsing Craigslist. I saw a few ads in which people openly stated they were on disability due to "bipolar disorder" or something like that. I know a lot of people who have made something out of nothing, and I know a lot of other people who can't get anything done.
Not everyone has the titanic will to overcome their place and time. Not everyone has the opportunity to exert that will even if they have it. The fact some people mooch is no more grounds to damn everyone seeking help any more than the fact that some guilty people go free is to damn anyone accused of anything.
The social safety net, like due process, is a social institution that, although subject to abuse, is better than nothing.
There's nothing more self-serving than arguing one's implied superiority because someone was fortunate enough to get superior results. All the more so since those people always make it sound like a Robinson Crusoe story and conveniently turn a blind eye to their own advantages, whether things in their environment, the subtle ways in which good government have made this country livable, or simply their own good fortune to be in the right place at the right time - or not to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
It's also hypocritical in the context of one's own patriotism. As they say - "love it or leave it". Who's to pick and choose one's countrymen - to say some people, a whole class of people, deserve their lot? You want to talk nationalism, consider we're all in this together - merits, faults and all. The purpose of social programs, at least in principle, is to fortify merits and minimize faults.
I don't deny that welfare, as it exists, is a badly designed program that by and large makes things worse. That's not to say the entire concept should be scrapped or that those in need deserve their lot in life.
Life's inherent unfairness is not sufficient reason to refuse to strive to make life more fair.
I think Nixon said it best:
Quote:
There are those who say that the old Spirit of ’76 is dead...that we no longer have the strength of character, the idealism, the faith in our founding purposes that that spirit represents.
Those who say this do not know America.
We have been undergoing self-doubts and self-criticism. But these are only the other side of our growing sensitivity to the persistence of want in the midst of plenty, of our impatience with the slowness with which old ills are being overcome.
If we were indifferent to the shortcomings of our society, or complacent about our institutions, or blind to the lingering inequities...then we would have lost our way.
But the fact that we have those concerns is evidence that our ideals, deep down, are still strong. Indeed, they remind us that what is really best about America is its compassion. They remind us that in the final analysis, America is great not because it is strong, not because it is rich, but because this is a good country.