Mayo. Need halp.

Eturnalshift · **Posted:** Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:45 pm

Why dez T-partah bros so violent and racist? Halp me understand k plz?

PS: Pay no attention to teh video title k?

Usdk · **Posted:** Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:15 pm

i hate political activists.

Dvergar · **Posted:** Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:15 pm

Oh yay, another back-and-forth thread full of youtube morons.

Mns · **Posted:** Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:22 pm

We've already had this argument of "Your side does it too so that magically makes it ok" multiple times.

Eturnalshift · **Posted:** Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:30 pm

Oh, dats rite. Last tiem we had dis one, you sed u wouldn't look at dat thred when told ur bffs were rly bad 2. Truf hurts. Got dat.

Sry but I had to share dis video hur so u culd c it since u ran from dat other one.

Mns · **Posted:** Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:55 pm

What do you want me to say?

Joklem · **Posted:** Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:01 pm

-----SANITY INTERMISSION-----

Fantastique · **Posted:** Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:24 pm

stupid thread is stupid

Yuratuhl · **Posted:** Thu Feb 10, 2011 7:08 pm

You know, every Supreme Court case I read, he writes his own opinion regardless of whether he concurs or dissents.

Not one of them has made any sense.

Joklem · **Posted:** Thu Feb 10, 2011 7:24 pm

Yuratuhl wrote:

You know, every Supreme Court case I read, he writes his own opinion regardless of whether he concurs or dissents.

Not one of them has made any sense.

This is how I imagine every debate going on down there from up here:

edit: I mean, do they ever actually debate the actual subject?

Dvergar · **Posted:** Thu Feb 10, 2011 8:03 pm

Yuratuhl wrote:

You know, every Supreme Court case I read, he writes his own opinion regardless of whether he concurs or dissents.

Not one of them has made any sense.

And they all start: "As the mount guy. . ."

Yuratuhl · **Posted:** Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:24 pm

I see what you did there.

No but really, he writes separate concurrences even when Scalia writes the goddamn majority. I don't like Scalia and usually disagree with what he says, but he's intelligent and tends to have logic behind his opinions. Thomas is contrary for the sake of being contrary, and says things that are frequently irrelevant.

Needhelp · **Posted:** Fri Feb 11, 2011 2:01 am

quadtard · **Posted:** Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:54 am

Jubbergun · **Posted:** Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:21 pm

Yuratuhl wrote:

I see what you did there.

No but really, he writes separate concurrences even when Scalia writes the goddamn majority. I don't like Scalia and usually disagree with what he says, but he's intelligent and tends to have logic behind his opinions. Thomas is contrary for the sake of being contrary, and says things that are frequently irrelevant.

Stop h8tin', you racist.

Your Pal,
Jubber

Bucket Guild | FUBU BH Forums

Mayo. Need halp.

Who is online