Joklem wrote:
(edit: that I dont understand is your assumption, and an idiotic one, I tried, but I'm done with you. Waste of time)
It is not an
assumption, I highlighted the specific disconnects in your reasoning caused by said lack of understanding.
Jubbergun wrote:
Pumping seawater into the plant doesn’t show “desperation.” Do you think they just threw up their hands, laid down some hose and a pump and went hog wild? The infrastructure to do this was likely in place because flooding the core/containment area is a common contingency. Yes, if you get that far down the list of contingencies, it’s bad. It doesn’t show “desperation,” it shows that, unlike previous incidents, some people are actually capable of following procedures.
No, it isn't. This typically isn't done because it exposes the seawater to radiation. There's also the issue that all that seawater will become superheated as steam, which has to be managed.
The plants were equipped with multiple pumps designed to function independently of the plant's main systems. Most of pumps apparently failed, and others have run out of fuel.
Jubbergun wrote:
I would trust the readings being taken on-site more than I would readings taken way off the coast on an aircraft carrier, even if that carrier is one of our own. Distance makes a lot of difference, and there is naturally a great deal of background radiation in the environment. The tools for measuring radiation that I am familiar with do not have a directional bias…in other words you can’t point your Geiger Counter North and find out how much radiation is in that direction. Any readings taken from a vessel off the coast are not going to accurately reflect what is going on because of the distance and the omni-directional nature of most instrumentation.
The principle behind shielding, just like electrical resistance, is that the energy is resisted at a predictable rate over distance and through impediments.
I haven't seen any sources as to the exact readings the carrier took, merely that the readings were sufficient to encourage them to move.
Jubbergun wrote:
You would need some context for those readings, anyway. My average exposure, despite working near an operational reactor and on a vessel carrying nuclear warheads, was far less than someone who never set foot near a submarine. Why? Background radiation, that’s why! I was shielded not only from the radioactive materials on board the boat, but also from solar activity and other environmental sources. You probably get more exposure from your television than the average submarine sailor does. I’d have to see these alleged aircraft carrier readings and compare them to what is considered standard exposure to know for sure, but what someone is terming as “significant” probably isn’t.
Whatever escaped was sufficient to get nuclear workers sick. Since then they've evacuated the area.
Jubbergun wrote:
This isn’t going to have any impact on Japanese whaling, because the government decided earlier this year to suspend their ‘research’ program because they didn’t want their citizens getting hurt by crazy tree-hugging jackasses on the high seas. Apparently, someone in the Japanese government was so appalled by the self-righteous dumb-assery of the Whale Wars show that they quit harvesting whales just to get it the fuck off television.
I am aware of that. I don't believe the decision was made for fear of people getting hurt, it was probably a graceful exit from a politically untenable position.
Jubbergun wrote:
Japan is also unlikely to borrow from us because we owe them assloads of money. You’re suggesting that the bank is going to come to the debtor for a loan? Geddouddatown!
That's not how it works. THe federal debt is merely the debt held by the federal government, not all American institutions etc.
Nations sell bonds to banks of any given nation. Even the Chinese themselves are massive debtors. EU, US, Japanese and Chinese banks all hold bonds against each others' home countries. Merely because the US govt owes a bunch of bond-holders money doesn't mean that US banks can't extend other governments loans.
Jubbergun wrote:
I haven’t seen any evidence that Japanese officials are lying about anything. They’re already taking maximum precautions by evacuating people and handing out iodine pills. There is no effort here to ‘save face’ or obscure anything. There is no policeman telling passers-by to move along because there is nothing to see here. There are even officials suggesting that the control rods are melting! That’s a Big Fucking Deal. You’re confusing skepticism with paranoia, and ending up on the side of the fence where you’re convinced “they’re out to get you.” OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOh…I’m a ghost, fear me because The Establishment says I don’t exist, therefore I must!
Full disclosure is not occurring, therefore there is a reason why.
Eliminate the impossible (that there is no leak, that the cooling systems are working fine, that the cores are cold), and whatever remains...