Aestu wrote:
I didn't mean that you're one of those black-hooded hooligans who run around throwing Molotov cocktails. I simply mean that the general theme of your beliefs seems to be opposition to exploitation by authority.
You distrust the two-party system because you see it as one big corrupt machine. The liberals, by contrast, are willing to accept its imperfections (or more so) and favor the Dems. The libertarians, on the other hand, oppose the dismantling of private authority created by private citizens by the state.
At least that's how it seemed to me - your theme seems to be freedom above all.
I don't advocate senseless violence that's associated with that logo or theme. I more so think along the lines that institutions have a natural evolution of desiring and seeking strength and growth. Which is why when it is a government institution that isn't obeying its restrictive laws intended to keep this in check (this constitution), you start to see the problems that are going on around us in terrible form right now.
Also my thoughts about the 2 party system are not just labeled, they are JUSTIFIED. GW Bush was elected under the premise of limiting government and having a humble foreign policy. He did the opposite and around 4-5 years later, every true person swayed by his lies woke up. Other side- B Obama was supposed to repeal the Patriot Act and the first thing he was going to do was end the wars... that have since expanded.. and the patriot act signed and extended.
Simply acknowledging bullshit, and be able to read history and see what has and hasn't worked doesn't merit Anarchist imho, even though I know you didn't mean it as a insult or as one of those drunk Canadian Hockey rage-rioters sense.
