Eturnalshift wrote:
Are you guys going to tell me we're a stronger, more emboldened country than we were several decades back?
You talk about strength and boldness but you don't know what those things mean.
Strength? Militarily, definitely, we've never been stronger in relative or absolute terms. Not only do we have more powerful weapons, but the USSR is gone, and EU military budgets have never been lower relative to our own. But strength isn't military...it's cultural, social, diplomatic, economic...but that's not your frame of reference now is it?
The greatest test of boldness - of courage - is to combat the greatest evils - ignorance, injustice, the status quo. Were we a bolder people...? Yes, but only because our willingness to do that was greater - the Clean Air Act, the Civil Rights Act, the Endangered Species act - that took strength we no longer have.
Quote:
Four years from now, America will celebrate the 200th anniversary of its founding as a Nation. There are those who say that the old Spirit of '76 is dead---that we no longer have the strength of character, the idealism, the faith in our founding purposes that that spirit represents.
Those who say this do not know America.
We have been undergoing self-doubts and self-criticism. But these are only the other side of our growing sensitivity to the persistence of want in the midst of plenty, of our impatience with the slowness with which age-old ills are being overcome.
If we were indifferent to the shortcomings of our society, or complacent about our institutions, or blind to the lingering inequities--then we would have lost our way.
But the fact that we have those concerns is evidence that our ideals, deep down, are still strong.
Eturnalshift wrote:
This country (and I think this was said by someone on this forum) has too many people that would just lay down and take an invasion rather than fight to protect our land and loved ones. We're all about "peace" but no one wants to sacrifice anything to get there. Conscription, like you said, would probably teach these people to be stronger and more apt to look adversity in the eye rather than just lay down and take it in the ass.
This isn't 1812. Nor are we living in an HG Wells novel.
Eturnalshift wrote:
Also, I think there is a distinction between "entitlement" and "paycheck", where people like the Rent-a-cops, Park Rangers and Guardsmen collect a "paycheck" for their service, much like the lawyer, chef, taxi driver or educator collects a pay for their service.
No, more like those bureaucrats who sit around collecting paychecks and leaving at 2PM, or those $30/hour guys in orange suits holding signs or chewing the fat while six men are assigned to a job that requires one.
That's the government employment you malign. And are a beneficiary of.
Eturnalshift wrote:
Not once did I ask to be looked at as a hero. Never have I boasted about my military experience EXCEPT when some little internet e-bitch wants to talk down to me as if I didn't have the backbone to enlist.
Hypocrite. You call other pussies, try to hold yourself up as superior, then pull out false modesty, which is the rhetorical equivalent of rolling over and playing dead.
That is courage - and cowardice. That is the courage our country lacks.