Aestu wrote:
Explain to me how building the Hoover Dam, laying countless miles of track and wire, and building innumerable public buildings still in use is less "productive" than war production. You realize tanks and planes don't contribute anything to the national productivity, right? That sort of thing is as "make work" as it gets.
It's less productive, in terms of growing an economy, because it's a one time expenditure that doesn't generate the possibility of any future growth/revenue. The money spent on tanks and planes doesn't just give someone a job until the tank/plane is done, it creates revenue for the company producing the item, which goes back into the company for maintenance and expansion, pays shareholders and employees, and perpetuates growth.
Aestu wrote:
The tax systems of the rest of the entire rest of the Western world stand as proof that you are wrong.
So we can't compare Reagan and Obama because "things are different now," but a comparison of two (or more) dissimilar systems is legitimate. Thanks for reassuring my lack of faith in our system of higher education.
I'm also glad that I'm being proven wrong by Greece and all the other countries that are falling to shambles doing the exact opposite of what I'm suggesting.
Aestu wrote:
Not to mention that taxes for the richest have never been lower in our own history, including the years this country was most prosperous.
They've also never been lower for around 50% of the country, either, considering that around 50% of us have no federal tax liability. What's your point? It does nothing to change the fact that tax increases (and the threat of them) have historically slowed economic growth, because when you tax something, you get less of it.
Aestu wrote:
What proof do you have that "Obamacare" is more responsible for the depression than Chinese competition, the mortgage crisis and two wars?
Since this isn't a court of law, why don't you tell me what proof you have that those things are more responsible than Obamacare. I mean, I only linked an American CEO telling you why Obamacare is creating uncertainty, so I guess I can understand how you think there's no evidence. The sky is magenta, after all.
Aestu wrote:
No, the fact that I disagree with people who approve of most of what I say and agree with most of my views then agree with people who think I'm stupid and crazy is proof that I'm probably the most objective person you will ever meet in your entire life.
Or it could just mean that you're argumentative for no reason, are poorly socialized, and utterly irrational.
Your Pal,
Jubber