Aestu wrote:
Jubbergun wrote:
There wouldn't be anything to 'adjust' if they'd been paid when they were due.
You have no idea what "adjustment" means in the context of accounting. It's not a euphemism.
So now, on top of everything else, you're an accounting major? I lived with a bookkeeper for eight years, I know enough in passing to know that 'adjusted' or not, businesses pay taxes quarterly and annually. If it's true that they're behind by
five to ten fucking years, there's really not a good excuse for that...except that, as usual, Aestu said so.
Aestu wrote:
EDIT: of course, we all know you'll Google it, and even though it means something totally incompatible with your current understanding of the issue, you'll find some contrived way of warping the definition to suit your ideological views.
Translation:
Pre-emptive 'nice google' in case anyone bothers to look at readily available information about how I'm wrong this time.You really don't have to bother, you're wrong often enough that I just assume I'm right if you're disagreeing.
Dvergar, it's not slander
if it's true, regardless of how shady the person making the allegation is.
Your Pal,
Jubber