Bucket Guild | FUBU BH Forums

I Has a Bucket: Preventing bucket theft on Bleeding Hollow | FUBU: A better BH Forum
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 9:55 am



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:11 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

Usdk wrote:
He's implying that it changed the election.

Which it didn't.


Not the point. When Bush came into office, he insisted he had a "mandate" and intended to "spend political capital". That perception of legitimacy is itself a powerful political force.

Also see: 1984


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:07 pm  
User avatar

Obama Zombie
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:48 pm
Posts: 3149
Location: NoVA
Offline

Aestu wrote:
The evidence that Eturnal is linking corroborates exactly what Mayo said which is that everyone thought it was Gore but Fox stuck its neck out to call for Bush.

Quote:
NBC had been first to declare a winner in Florida on Tuesday, saying Al Gore won at 7:50 p.m EST. Its rivals quickly followed suit, basing their information largely on polling data provided by Voter News Service, a consortium created by The Associated Press, ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox and NBC.

Had you have read what I linked you'll have read that all the major news outlets (including Fox News) declared Al Gore the winner before all the votes in all the precincts were in. Strangely enough, Mayo isn't concerned that all the major news networks got the call wrong the first time... rather, he's more focused on Fox getting the call right about 6-7 hours after everyone (including Fox) initially got it wrong. Realistically, Bush was the winner of the 2000 election (the initial vote and several recounts afterwards proved this) and, as such, he was the President. Someone calling someone else the night of the election doesn't magically add extra votes after the polls are closed and that's why I question the relevance. Why? Because it's Fox News and Mayo is a little bitch about them because they don't share the same world view.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:47 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

Eturnalshift wrote:
Aestu wrote:
The evidence that Eturnal is linking corroborates exactly what Mayo said which is that everyone thought it was Gore but Fox stuck its neck out to call for Bush.

Quote:
NBC had been first to declare a winner in Florida on Tuesday, saying Al Gore won at 7:50 p.m EST. Its rivals quickly followed suit, basing their information largely on polling data provided by Voter News Service, a consortium created by The Associated Press, ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox and NBC.

Had you have read what I linked you'll have read that all the major news outlets (including Fox News) declared Al Gore the winner before all the votes in all the precincts were in. Strangely enough, Mayo isn't concerned that all the major news networks got the call wrong the first time... rather, he's more focused on Fox getting the call right about 6-7 hours after everyone (including Fox) initially got it wrong. Realistically, Bush was the winner of the 2000 election (the initial vote and several recounts afterwards proved this) and, as such, he was the President. Someone calling someone else the night of the election doesn't magically add extra votes after the polls are closed and that's why I question the relevance. Why? Because it's Fox News and Mayo is a little bitch about them because they don't share the same world view.


Quote:
At 2:16 a.m., Fox News Channel declared Bush the winner in Florida. Within four minutes, NBC, CBS, CNN and ABC did the same. The AP said the race was still too close to name a winner.


You're linking the information that corroborates your claim, but the information that contradicts it is still there.

The AP is a consortium, not an umbrella organization. AP member outlets are free to do their own thing, which is what Fox did, for its own reasons.

You say they got it right...because that's what everyone went along with, like it or not? Why? Media influence. Circular reasoning at its finest.


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:19 pm  
User avatar

Obama Zombie
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:48 pm
Posts: 3149
Location: NoVA
Offline

Quote:
You're linking the information that corroborates your claim, but the information that contradicts it is still there.

I don't know what contradiction you're trying to make. I'm just calling Mayo out for being a little pussy and going on and on over the evil Fox News when there really isn't any reason to. If you want to argue some other tangential point then go right ahead... just don't become more of a pest when I stop entertaining your "I'm arguing for the sake of arguing" shit.

Quote:
You say they got it right...because that's what everyone went along with, like it or not? Why? Media influence.

...which is what Fox did, for its own reasons

Fox News got it right because that's what the polls showed. After the first count Bush was in the lead. After subsequent recounts Bush still held his lead, although the margin lowered significantly. That's how presidential elections work, Aestu - states count up all the votes and the winner gets a number of state delegates, and the candidate with the highest number of delegates is the winner.

Hell, if I said that night, "I declare Bush to be the winner" I wouldn't have been wrong because that's the reality we live in - Bush won. The only thing shitting on Fox News during that election coverage is their declaration that Gore won... obviously, he didn't.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:13 pm  
User avatar

French Faggot
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:15 pm
Posts: 5227
Location: New Jersey
Offline

And then the Supreme Court picked the president. Funny how that worked out.


If destruction exists, we must destroy everything.
Shuruppak Yuratuhl
Slaad Shrpk Breizh
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:14 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 7047
Offline

I always wondered why that went to the supreme court.


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 1:16 am  
User avatar

Old Conservative Faggot
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 12:19 am
Posts: 4308
Location: Winchester Virginia
Offline

I lived in FL during that fiasco.

My brother was living with me so he could go to college. The news networks were calling the state an hour before the polls closed in the western part of the state (the panhandle) which is heavily republican. If the news networks hadn't made that call and started the ticker-tape for Gore before all the polls closed, there's a very real possibility a lot of the people that turned out in the last hour to vote (and there were a lot) would have stayed at home, and Gore might have gotten the victory that was claimed for him early.

I only remember this because when they called it for Gore, my brother predicted this, then he was very smug about it for the next several months.

What kills me about complaints about Jeb being governor (or having relatives on Fox News--especially after seeing Fox did the same thing everyone else did) is that the counties under the most scrutiny favored democrats, and the one ballot that Gore's team complained about (the one that had people casting a vote for Pat Buchanan, if I recall correctly) was designed and printed by an elections official who was himself a democrat.

Your Pal,
Jubber


AKA "The Gun"
AKA "ROFeraL"

World Renowned Mexican Forklift Artiste
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:50 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

My maternal grandmother, great-grandmother and maternal aunt once removed lived in Florida during the election. They disagree, as do many Floridans, but that doesn't prove anything any more than your living there does.


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 9:24 am  
User avatar

Obama Zombie
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:48 pm
Posts: 3149
Location: NoVA
Offline

Yuratuhl wrote:
And then the Supreme Court picked the president. Funny how that worked out.

I don't remember the Supreme Court 'picking' the President. Didn't they just rule that all the recounts were unconstitutional for some disparity in the recount methodology? In that case (where the recounts were going to Bush anyways), Bush was going to be the winner. Where Gore could've possibly won is when you look at the overvotes of the butterfly ballot (that Jubber talked about), but I'm pretty sure the rules said you can only cast one vote... and Bush also had his share of overvotes, too.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:28 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

Eturnalshift wrote:
I don't remember the Supreme Court 'picking' the President. Didn't they just rule that all the recounts were unconstitutional for some disparity in the recount methodology?


Modus operandi. And how could a recount be unconstitutional?


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:43 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 7047
Offline

I don't think it was the recount that was unconstitutional, but the manner in which it was performed.


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:59 am  
User avatar

Obama Zombie
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:48 pm
Posts: 3149
Location: NoVA
Offline

Aestu wrote:
Eturnalshift wrote:
I don't remember the Supreme Court 'picking' the President. Didn't they just rule that all the recounts were unconstitutional for some disparity in the recount methodology?


And how could a recount be unconstitutional?

+1 for USD having reading comprehension; +1 for Jubber always saying Aestu has none.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 11:05 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

So it was unconstitutional because it was unconstitutional? That is what you're saying, whether you realize it or not.

Hmm, let's see. Show me on the doll - I mean, uh, the Constitution - where it was violated.


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 11:17 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 7047
Offline

you are so missing the point its not even....well actually it still is pretty funny.


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: When will the "recounts" and "misplaced ballots" start?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 11:32 am  
User avatar

Obama Zombie
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:48 pm
Posts: 3149
Location: NoVA
Offline

Aestu wrote:
So it was unconstitutional because it was unconstitutional? That is what you're saying, whether you realize it or not.

Hmm, let's see. Show me on the doll - I mean, uh, the Constitution - where it was violated.

Maybe if you weren't so afraid of using Google you'd know why the justices said it was unconstitutional. (Just read any summary about Bush v. Gore - You don't have to agree with the judgement to understand why the justices ruled the way they did.)
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

World of Warcraft phpBB template "WoWMoonclaw" created by MAËVAH (ex-MOONCLAW) (v3.0.8.0) - wowcr.net : World of Warcraft styles & videos
© World of Warcraft and Blizzard Entertainment are trademarks or registered trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. in the U.S. and/or other countries. wowcr.net is in no way associated with Blizzard Entertainment.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group