Bucket Guild | FUBU BH Forums

I Has a Bucket: Preventing bucket theft on Bleeding Hollow | FUBU: A better BH Forum
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 10:09 am



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: @Conservatives
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:44 am  
User avatar

Fat Bottomed Faggot
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:53 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Minnesota
Offline

I don't understand how any homosexual soldier is ok revealing something that may have a negative impact on their unit's ability to work together.

I also don't understand why anybody would place much care on the fact.

But it happens.

The military should be allowed to do what it needs to to ensure it's ability is and remains as high as possible.

DADT was a compromise. I get annoyed with this idea that it was AN AWFUL PIECE OF LEGISLATION MEANT TO DISCRIMINATE AND FORCE HOMO'S INTO THE CLOSET. When it was made to let homo's serve without disrupting the military's ability to perform.

That being said, I think it's being repealed is a good sign of humanity's broadening tolerance.


"Ok we aren't such things and birds are pretty advanced. They fly and shit from anywhere they want. While we sit on our automatic toilets, they're shitting on people and my car while a cool breeze tickles their anus. That's the life."
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @Conservatives
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:43 am  
User avatar

MegaFaggot 5000
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 11:39 pm
Posts: 4804
Location: Cinci, OH
Offline

Weena wrote:
I don't understand how any homosexual soldier is ok revealing something that may have a negative impact on their unit's ability to work together.

Its not their fault that people in their unit are homophobes. Its not like they dress up as the village people and dance around in live combat. They're the exact same as everyone else, just that they like dudes a little more than the already suspiciously homoerotic soldiers.

Quote:
DADT was a compromise. I get annoyed with this idea that it was AN AWFUL PIECE OF LEGISLATION MEANT TO DISCRIMINATE AND FORCE HOMO'S INTO THE CLOSET.

That's funny, because I'm pretty sure that's exactly what DADT did. If you got outed, you got discharged. I don't see how thats anything besides "keep your dick away from me, queer".
Quote:
When it was made to let homo's serve without disrupting the military's ability to perform.

Its not their fault that people in their unit are homophobes. Its not like they dress up as the village people and dance around in live combat. They're the exact same as everyone else, just that they like dudes a little more than the already suspiciously homoerotic soldiers.
Quote:
That being said, I think it's being repealed is a good sign of humanity's broadening tolerance.

Is this you admitting that DADT was a backwards policy? Because that's what it sounds like.

If you're going to say that repealing DADT was a step towards a more tolerant nation, why even bother defending DADT in the first place?

You'd make a great lay for a gay dude. If you can already deepthroat your foot so well, I don't imagine a dick would be too hard.


RETIRED.
[armory loc="US,Bleeding Hollow"]Mayonaise[/armory]
[armory loc="US,Bleeding Hollow"]Jerkonaise[/armory]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @Conservatives
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:46 am  
User avatar

MegaFaggot 5000
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 11:39 pm
Posts: 4804
Location: Cinci, OH
Offline

PS: This thread is pointless. Most of the people arguing that the gay dude was in the wrong for being gay already have said they think homosexuality is a choice.

Maybe that miserable faggot should stop rebelling against his parents and start acting in line. Am I right, guys?


RETIRED.
[armory loc="US,Bleeding Hollow"]Mayonaise[/armory]
[armory loc="US,Bleeding Hollow"]Jerkonaise[/armory]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @Conservatives
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:39 am  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

Weena wrote:
I don't understand how any homosexual soldier is ok revealing something that may have a negative impact on their unit's ability to work together.

I also don't understand why anybody would place much care on the fact.

But it happens.

The military should be allowed to do what it needs to to ensure it's ability is and remains as high as possible.

DADT was a compromise. I get annoyed with this idea that it was AN AWFUL PIECE OF LEGISLATION MEANT TO DISCRIMINATE AND FORCE HOMO'S INTO THE CLOSET. When it was made to let homo's serve without disrupting the military's ability to perform.

That being said, I think it's being repealed is a good sign of humanity's broadening tolerance.


The same thing was said about blacks in uniform and it didn't pan out. Well-disciplined soldiers put their jobs first.


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @Conservatives
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:09 pm  
User avatar

Fat Bottomed Faggot
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:53 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Minnesota
Offline

Mns wrote:
That's funny, because I'm pretty sure that's exactly what DADT did. If you got outed, you got discharged. I don't see how thats anything besides "keep your dick away from me, queer".


It didn't (or the idea was) that you weren't discriminated against unless you were the one that decided to out yourself.

Mns wrote:
Is this you admitting that DADT was a backwards policy?


'Misguided' would be a better word to describe what I thought about it.

Mns wrote:
If you're going to say that repealing DADT was a step towards a more tolerant nation, why even bother defending DADT in the first place?


If DADT actually ensured cohesion among units that old fashioned military discipline couldn't handle, I'd be in favor of it. Because I'd rather risk hurting somebody's feelings than deprive my military of the ability to do it's job at the greatest capacity.

But I don't think it does. A lot of people however, think it does.

I was trying to give a better understanding of where people are coming from. Not everybody against DADT's repeal are homophobes.

Aestu wrote:
The same thing was said about blacks in uniform and it didn't pan out. Well-disciplined soldiers put their jobs first.


Right. I think good old fashioned military discipline can handle the issue.


"Ok we aren't such things and birds are pretty advanced. They fly and shit from anywhere they want. While we sit on our automatic toilets, they're shitting on people and my car while a cool breeze tickles their anus. That's the life."
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @Conservatives
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:26 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 8116
Offline

Weena wrote:
Right. I think good old fashioned military discipline can handle the issue.


Image


Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @Conservatives
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:38 pm  
User avatar

Fat Bottomed Faggot
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:53 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Minnesota
Offline

Wut?


"Ok we aren't such things and birds are pretty advanced. They fly and shit from anywhere they want. While we sit on our automatic toilets, they're shitting on people and my car while a cool breeze tickles their anus. That's the life."
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @Conservatives
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:18 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 8:41 am
Posts: 4695
Offline

Image


Azelma

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @Conservatives
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:21 pm  
User avatar

Querulous Quidnunc
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:39 pm
Posts: 3686
Location: Potomac, MD
Offline

It's simple really.

Conservatives:
- Don't want gays to marry because they are gay and icky.
- Don't want gays to serve openly because they are gay and icky.

Liberals:
- Don't mind gays marrying because there are NO downsides to it whatsoever.
- Don't mind gays serving openly because there are NO downsides to it whatsoever.

Why is this a thread? We all know where everyone on this board stands on this issue.


[✔] [item]Thunderfury, Blessed Blade of the Windseeker[/item] (Three)
[✔] [item]Sulfuras, Hand of Ragnaros[/item] (Two)
[✔] [item]32837[/item] & [item]32838[/item]
[✔] [item]Thori'dal, the Stars' Fury[/item]
[✔] [item]46017[/item]
[✔] [item]49623[/item] (Two)
[✔] [item]71086[/item]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @Conservatives
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:31 pm  
Kunckleheaded Knob
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:08 pm
Posts: 463
Offline

Not like it takes a whole lot of skill or courage to fly remote control airplanes around and blast civilians who are armed with rocks.


zzzzzz


http://www.wowarmory.com/character-shee ... n=Mazeltov
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @Conservatives
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:01 pm  
User avatar

French Faggot
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:15 pm
Posts: 5227
Location: New Jersey
Offline

Weena wrote:
Not everybody against DADT's repeal are homophobes.


Yes, yes they are. It doesn't matter how people against the repeal think of themselves, they're homophobes. Every justification used in favor of DADT is a shill (hi5 Aestu words) for homophobia.

Also, picture of Edmund Duke, thread over.


If destruction exists, we must destroy everything.
Shuruppak Yuratuhl
Slaad Shrpk Breizh
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @Conservatives
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:13 am  
User avatar

Stupid Schlemiel
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 4:53 pm
Posts: 1808
Offline

Image


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

World of Warcraft phpBB template "WoWMoonclaw" created by MAËVAH (ex-MOONCLAW) (v3.0.8.0) - wowcr.net : World of Warcraft styles & videos
© World of Warcraft and Blizzard Entertainment are trademarks or registered trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. in the U.S. and/or other countries. wowcr.net is in no way associated with Blizzard Entertainment.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group