Bucket Guild | FUBU BH Forums

Poor religious rabbit.

ITT: mazeltov turns me into an atheist

i wonder what he thinks about intelligent design

without every piece you can't be sure there isn't a duck in it :3

That's cute, but I think I'll buy what the two published economists are selling, thanks...at least until I can get a look at their actual article on the subject and the peer review, but it seems to be locked in one of those educational sites that requires some sort of subscription.



C'mon bro, at least Aestu did his usual monkey dance for the organ grinder instead of just tossing it aside because it wasn't written by the BBC.

Your Pal,
Jubber

AKA "The Gun"
AKA "ROFeraL"

World Renowned Mexican Forklift Artiste

Many people bought what Marx and Lenin sold.
It didn't work either.

You talk about 1984 and things like groupthink and the retroactive rewriting of the past but you seem curiously blind when you believe things just because other people do, or when the history books are rewritten to rationalize what isn't working in the here and now.

Aestu of Bleeding Hollow...

Nihilism is a copout.

Julian Assange versus Mark Zuckerberg...Wikileaks v Facebook.

Something's wrong here, where are my up and down votes?

Oh wait I thought this was the frontpage of Reddit, easy mistake I guess.

Dvergar /
Quisling

i like that last one

That made me laugh, but only because I often get the "that's racist," or "you're an asshole," or "you don't care about poor people," or <insert other dumbassery here>, when I challenge the assumptions you and others here hold. There's a difference between knowing what's right when I see it and following the herd like some of the rest of you. And even if I'm wrong (which I'm not), I'd rather be wrong on my own terms than right because I held to the conventional 'wisdom' as strongly as you and others. The fact that so many of you who are otherwise not retarded bought into a graph that had been debunked months ago (and originated in Nancy Pelosi's office, Fanta, so if you want to complain about 'bias sources,' take a grain of salt) only serves to prove the point.

Your Pal,
Jubber

AKA "The Gun"
AKA "ROFeraL"

World Renowned Mexican Forklift Artiste

O look the two forum monkeys are throwing their shit at each other again big fucking surprise.

I should have clarified, I was referring to the article that basically debunked the graph as "unbiased." My apologies.

But that opens another can of worms, called "What the hell ISN'T biased nowadays?" Can we really throw entire arguments and evidence out of the window just because someone stood to gain, even a little, by supporting it? Or should there be a "biased continuum" where things that fall towards to center can be accepted whereas those on the ends should be discounted? I think this board needs to stop running to the "BIASED SOURCE" argument, and instead try and think of good, original counter points.

Unless you bring up Fox news, which is not only stupid on your part but just objectively wrong pretty much always.

[✔] [item]Thunderfury, Blessed Blade of the Windseeker[/item] (Three)
[✔] [item]Sulfuras, Hand of Ragnaros[/item] (Two)
[✔] [item]32837[/item] & [item]32838[/item]
[✔] [item]Thori'dal, the Stars' Fury[/item]
[✔] [item]46017[/item]
[✔] [item]49623[/item] (Two)
[✔] [item]71086[/item]

I think the weather channel is unbiased.

But they are overly excited about hurricanes.

this made me chuckle

[✔] [item]Thunderfury, Blessed Blade of the Windseeker[/item] (Three)
[✔] [item]Sulfuras, Hand of Ragnaros[/item] (Two)
[✔] [item]32837[/item] & [item]32838[/item]
[✔] [item]Thori'dal, the Stars' Fury[/item]
[✔] [item]46017[/item]
[✔] [item]49623[/item] (Two)
[✔] [item]71086[/item]

I don't understand why the weather channel feels the need to actually send reporters out into the hurricanes. Can't they just tell us about it without sending a guy out there in a raincoat?



Also, RE: Jubber/Aestu/etc.

You can make statistics say whatever the hell you want them to say depending on what numbers you decide to show. That graph I posted is proof of that.