Dvergar wrote:
So despite being schooled on these boards and the overabundance of scientific evidence coupled with near unanimous agreement amongst climate experts, this is still the route you're taking?
So despite being schooled on these boards about how the 'overabundance' of scientific 'evidence' is flawed in many ways, and more than ample proof that there is no 'unanimous agreement' among climate 'experts' (some of the ones whom agree with your point-of-view not even working in relevant fields), you're still going to take the route that somehow the theory of anthropogenic warming is 'settled' science? Never mind that much of this "OMG the sky is falling" idiocy is driven by the results of computer models
that have never accurately forecast coming trends, there's a "consensus," which is hardly the argument you should be making in any way, shape, or form when my initial point was that some of you are sheep who blindly follow along so long as there are enough people in front of you to make it worth following.
EDIT: And I should probably toss in that calling it "gospel" isn't a stretch when you're talking about some modern-day 'inquisitor' suggesting that there be penalties for the 'heretics.' Cullen's complaint(s) about the people she wants her "church" to punish wasn't about methodology or truth, her complaints were about their results/findings, and how they weren't getting the ones her "religion" demanded.
Dvergar wrote:
Only on the right can such foolishness pass as a laudable trait.
I'd much rather be a liberal. I think it would be a lot more fun to sit around smugly satisfied about myself for no reason while looking down my nose at other people because they don't buy into the same bullshit I do.
Your Pal,
Jubber