Happy Valentine's Day Aestu

Aestu · **Posted:** Tue Feb 14, 2012 3:58 pm

Weena wrote:

I think you mean men should be able to buy that vaginal wetness for which I don't know if there is a name.

Not only is there not a name, modern science is actually extremely unclear on its exact origin and composition. It is one of the most poorly understood elements of human physiology. For example, it's not known exactly how vaginal lubrication is connected to the urinary tract or whether it is at all.

Funny, isn't it?

Eturnalshift · **Posted:** Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:03 pm

I thought science called it, "Mazola"

OK OK OK I'm done.

Aestu · **Posted:** Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:07 pm

Someone should do research on human cheese. I bet there's a novelty market.

...Simone?

Battletard · **Posted:** Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:33 pm

Should just market it as 'Penis Storage Space for Rent'

Yuratuhl · **Posted:** Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:58 pm

Aestu wrote:

Yuratuhl wrote:

Those are called hands. Most of us have two, and you can try the Stranger if you're feeling frisky and want to fool yourself.

I could just as easily argue that the other side of the analogy could be fulfilled by dolls and playing house.

I think the problem is treating pleasure as the utility for men. I'd think it's a utility for everyone.

I have no opposition to government-subsidized fucking, especially if everyone enjoys it. I just don't think that kind of thing is necessary, since bars and alcohol exist.

Aestu · **Posted:** Tue Feb 14, 2012 8:44 pm

Yuratuhl wrote:

I think the problem is treating pleasure as the utility for men. I'd think it's a utility for everyone.

I have no opposition to government-subsidized fucking, especially if everyone enjoys it. I just don't think that kind of thing is necessary, since bars and alcohol exist.

You could apply the same logic to sperm banks and baby making.

Azelma · **Posted:** Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:31 am

Aestu · **Posted:** Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:39 am

It's called no-fault divorce. Or a man known as Azelma.

Battletard · **Posted:** Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:21 am

Technology gadget IMO.

You wear it or carry it on your person

Others that have it can assign you a rating.

You assign others a rating.

Select your gender and sexual preference, etc.

Select minimum threshold standard for rating

When your device is in range of another's, and both of you are 'flagged' as 'DTF', and your thresholds are greater than or equal to the others standards, the two devices communicate and allow you to find each other.

lol

Edit: would only work in densely populated areas with a large amount of users participating.

Azelma · **Posted:** Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:31 am

I like this idea and I think it would work out well for me.

Aestu · **Posted:** Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:51 am

Flaw: Women do not consider physical attractiveness important.

Azelma · **Posted:** Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:04 pm

Aestu wrote:

Flaw: Women do not consider physical attractiveness important.

Disagree-ish.

Some women certainly do. But you're right others are far more concerned with social status. The truth is, both can have weight in selecting a mate.

Therefore, I suggest a modification to Battletard's instrument.

Keep all the attractiveness thresholds but give the woman the option to scan the man which would return his job title, yearly salary figures, and potential net-worth (given his history of earnings/expenditures/debt) at the age of retirement.

Aestu · **Posted:** Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:19 pm

Azelma wrote:

Keep all the attractiveness thresholds but give the woman the option to scan the man which would return his job title, yearly salary figures, and potential net-worth (given his history of earnings/expenditures/debt) at the age of retirement.

Those things are more important than attractiveness, but even more important than either is poise and virility. Those things can't be defined objectively, except maybe just by how many notches one has on one's belt.

Exhibit A: Usdk

Azelma · **Posted:** Wed Feb 15, 2012 1:00 pm

I'm curious as to how a woman could judge my virility without y'know...actually attempting to sleep with me?

I get the poise thing...if I'm stuttering, can't look her in the eye, and generally coming across as an insecure wreck...yeah I have no poise, and that's extremely unattractive.

Really this is all about getting her into the bedroom...that's the hardest part. Virility may screw you over in the long run, but poise, looks, and sound financials will get you into the driver seat. If you crash the car because you suck at having sex, then that's your problem.

The only time the virility question could be a factor in you NOT getting her to the bedroom is if she has friends who have been with you and mention how bad you were.

I suppose if you wanted to we could build a review system into Battletards device. Other women could attest to your virility (or lack thereof). Kind of like Yelp or Amazon Reviews...but for a potential mate.

Aestu · **Posted:** Wed Feb 15, 2012 1:11 pm

I'm talking about virility in terms of psychology and values.
(It's too easy for me to say it's fitting you'd fail to understand that.)

Women care relatively little about a man's sexual performance unless he means nothing else to her.

But as you say, it all boils down to getting into the bedroom so you can use the equipment. Doesn't that prove your entire view is hypocritical?

Bucket Guild | FUBU BH Forums

Happy Valentine's Day Aestu

Who is online