Drominar wrote:
I understand your point but I disagree. I want Netherlands or Belgium to be the leader, not be EU's bitch. They would listen to proposals of the EU countries but they would be the one with the vote. The 5 hour talks or whatever at the round table are unavoidable, but having the EU at one of the chairs would probably mean they would have a 2 day discussion before the SC vote on something and end up vetoing until a time where they can reach an internal consensus on what they want. Pointless hassle, it's like combining the Muslim countries with Israel and giving that new league/union a shared seat. Endless in-fighting and nothing would get done. The power has to be more centralized on a single country for each seat if you want anything to get done.
That's true of any country's internal political framework. The problem with the EU is simply that they don't have one, and having them air their dirty laundry when bigger problems are on the plate isn't going to make for a better decision making process at the next level up.
Basically, you're talking about imposing on the SC the worst characteristic of Congress.
Eturnalshift wrote:
How about I ask a different way; by which metrics are you using to measure the claims against other countries that you list as being unlike Iran, and what are your sources for those claims?
The scope of your question is so broad that to answer it would require a TLDR beyond even my capacity. Basically, you're asking for a book on the world as we know it. The corollary being - you don't. No surprises there.
Would you mind narrowing its scope to a single claim I made that you believe is untrue?
