Aestu wrote:
Ok, so you would rather American workers lose jobs and fuck up the environment rather than government succeed in fixing the problem. You'll pray to your Free Market God and wait for a response.
This question is predicated on the assumption that giving $10 million to Philips will effectively accomplish either one of those goals. I don't believe it does. It's an assumption that also disregards any cost/benefit analysis. How many jobs are we getting for that $10 million? Could we get more jobs, or a greater environmental impact, applying that $10 million in another sector? It also ignores that we'll still have cheaper bulbs on the market in competition with the $50 bulb. That $10 million dollar isn't bringing every bulb-making job back to America, and the environment will still be getting fucked up elsewhere. Tossing that $10 million to Philips did nothing except enrich Philips.
Aestu wrote:
TLDR some people would rather everything suck than government actually manage to do something right
"Government can't do anything right"
"Why not?"
"Because it's government"
"But they just did"
"No, they didn't"
"Why not?"
"Because it's government"
This arguement is predicated on the assumption that the government did something right in this case, which it didn't. This assumption, and the juvenile sarcasm that goes along with it, ignore that no one is arguing that there is no legitimate role for government. However, as I stated earlier, when government moves beyond those legitimate roles, as it did here, it is not a good thing.
Aestu wrote:
And yet those people might have a chance of breaking out of poverty if they could stop living hand-to-mouth. Reducing their energy bills would definitely help.
I'm going to keep this one on file for the next time you're making one of your bread-and-circuses arguments about why one of us is a terrible person for suggesting that making bad decisions contributes to a person having a low standard of living.
Aestu wrote:
All this really boils down to it seems is intense fear of change.
The change in technology is going to come. The only thing the government can really do effectively is hinder that change with regulation. If anyone is demonstrating a "fear of change," it's anyone having the reaction you're having when confronted with the idea that perhaps the last 60-100 years of government overreach needs to come to an end.
Your Pal,
Jubber