Battletard wrote:
Aestu, you titled the thread with an intentionally controversial title knowing full well people would bite, and it worked. I have no issue with this. My issue is that neither of your two links have anything to justify your claims.
Then you didn't read them.
Battletard wrote:
The Stratfor link is much broader in scope than the US Marine Corps. It has huge reality shattering ramifications across the map. The fact that you mentioned only the US Marine Corps is evidence that you, just like everyone else, has an agenda to push and a bias.
Irrelevant. If the position and bias are rational and valid then that is not a count against the speaker or his argument.
Battletard wrote:
The way you present yourself is laughable. You cannot present this as being factually accurate without specific examples to back up your claims. The very fact that you mentioned only the Marines in your title and had no mention of Stratfor or any other organizations and then immediately classified anyone who disagreed with you as 'stupid' proves you have no intention of engaging in any kind of debate or exchange of ideas, you just want to piss on the hornets nest and engage in your mental masturbation routine that has become so typical.
The cult of militarism is integral to the big picture. It is the wide base of the ideological pyramid. It is its
center of gravity.
Battletard wrote:
I don't favor censorship, I'm not against the exchange of ideas in any form.
The core issue is that this thread was never about an exchange of ideas, it was about being controversial and setting yourself up to be in a position to argue without any objective other than to satisfy your ego.
My objective is to change minds and get a point across.
Battletard wrote:
Ego. That's what you are dude, and it's not at all justified. The 'quasi dysfunctional child' that I am may or may not be just that, but I have the cajones to say my shit does stink and I'm not afraid of that. I'm okay with being wrong. I view being proven wrong as an opportunity to learn and not something to be ashamed of.
No, you don't, because when someone makes a point in a forceful way or above your level you cry. If the issue were not your insecurity, debate would not evoke a heated response nor baseless accusations of ego or bullying etc.
Battletard wrote:
Sucks for you that this isn't the case where you're concerned.
You are proving me correct in that while you vaguely state that your "shit stinks", this is merely a shill: you refuse to consider specific ways in which your shit stinks and the ramifications it has on your thinking and actions.
Admitting your shit stinks means making peace with your imperfections. That is the very definition of being secure as opposed to insecure. One cannot make peace with one's imperfections so long as one refuses to identify them and integrate them into one's personality, something I've never declined to do. So your claims to the contrary are factually incorrect.
You're also provably wrong in that a few threads back, you made the rather self-serving observation that you "don't make a point of getting offended". I disagreed. Then you, um, made the choice to get offended. And here in this very thread you MADE THE CHOICE TO GET OFFENDED when you, personally, were not attacked, nor was the intent of the thread in any way hostile to you or anything important to you.
So clearly you do, in fact, have issues admitting your shit stinks, when, provably, it does.
Your accusations thereof towards me are clearly driven by emotional factors - projection and cognitive dissonance.