@Sherlock

Dotzilla · **Posted:** Tue May 15, 2012 3:20 pm

Mns wrote:

Dotzilla wrote:

god, this is boring. it's like trying to explain art to a republican.

you've found republican art! you must've found it in atlantis next to a unicorn.

Azelma · **Posted:** Tue May 15, 2012 3:49 pm

Dotzilla wrote:

just because something sounds like something you know, doesn't mean it has anything to do with anything you know.

I'll be starting a collection to have a plaque made with this statement and mailed to Aestu. PM me if you'd like to donate.

Weena · **Posted:** Tue May 15, 2012 6:58 pm

Zaryi wrote:

I WANT TO KNOW HOW HE DID IT OMG

Like, I just finished it last night. I could barely sleep last night trying to figure out how he pulled it off.

Cmon, it was a three pipe problem at most.

Aestu · **Posted:** Tue May 15, 2012 7:04 pm

Weena wrote:

Cmon, it was a three pipe problem at most.

You obviously never played Lost Levels with the three-pipe warp zones leading backwards.

By the time you see them, it's too late. Your only choice is how far back you will go.

Zaryi · **Posted:** Wed May 16, 2012 3:55 pm

Dotzilla wrote:

zaryi, to me it seems the simplest answer is generally the right one. there's a truck going by, and one of those shop tents is also below him. i also find it interesting that he told John to stay RIGHT where he was, knowing that John was obscured from the eventual impact site, and would be slowed by the biker (employed by sherlock). i think he jumped, fell into a tent or on top of a truck, or a combination of the two, landed on the ground with enough force to convince a curious passerby, fake blood, etc. also, you can see john trying to take his pulse but someone pulls him away before he can. with some help from molly, voila.

what do you think?

Yah, that's petty much what I was thinking, and it was only further solidified by this video which lays everything out very neatly.

Dotzilla · **Posted:** Wed May 16, 2012 4:44 pm

oooo yeah that makes even more sense with the impostor moriarty used to steal the children. where else would a look-a-like thug moriarty no longer needed end up? in molly's mortuary! it's so hard to keep in mind that sherlock picked the meeting spot, so in theory, every single person on the street could have been helping him.

Lucinth · **Posted:** Wed May 16, 2012 7:48 pm

I wonder if Moriarty was influenced by an actual ancestor of mine or if it was just a name.

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2

Aestu · **Posted:** Wed May 16, 2012 8:36 pm

Dotzilla wrote:

oooo yeah that makes even more sense with the impostor moriarty used to steal the children. where else would a look-a-like thug moriarty no longer needed end up? in molly's mortuary! it's so hard to keep in mind that sherlock picked the meeting spot, so in theory, every single person on the street could have been helping him.

But Moriarty accepted the spot. So it's no less likely that anyone could be helping him.

Don't forget, Sherlock also has The Code, meaning he could have used it to make the imposter think he was following Moriarty's instructions, obeying a remote command to show up.

See, this is why it's not true mystery - there are no "knowns".

Lucinth wrote:

I wonder if Moriarty was influenced by an actual ancestor of mine or if it was just a name.

"Smith?!? We don't know anyone named 'Smith'!"

Dotzilla · **Posted:** Wed May 16, 2012 11:25 pm

Aestu wrote:

Dotzilla wrote:

oooo yeah that makes even more sense with the impostor moriarty used to steal the children. where else would a look-a-like thug moriarty no longer needed end up? in molly's mortuary! it's so hard to keep in mind that sherlock picked the meeting spot, so in theory, every single person on the street could have been helping him.

But Moriarty accepted the spot. So it's no less likely that anyone could be helping him.

Don't forget, Sherlock also has The Code, meaning he could have used it to make the imposter think he was following Moriarty's instructions, obeying a remote command to show up.

See, this is why it's not true mystery - there are no "knowns".

Lucinth wrote:

I wonder if Moriarty was influenced by an actual ancestor of mine or if it was just a name.

"Smith?!? We don't know anyone named 'Smith'!"

"the code" is actually nothing, which moriarty admits towards the end of the episode. just another part of his plan. whether this is a lie or not still remains to be seen.

ethan, you might as well just watch the show. if you can somehow turn off your Jeffrey Dahmer switch for an hour or so, you might enjoy it. also, you could add to the discussion with a little more color.

Aestu · **Posted:** Wed May 16, 2012 11:28 pm

Dotzilla wrote:

"the code" is actually nothing, which moriarty admits towards the end of the episode. just another part of his plan. whether this is a lie or not still remains to be seen.

Again - it's not a mystery if there aren't knowable facts, and it's not even a drama if the characters aren't clearly defined and behave in characteristic ways.

Dotzilla wrote:

ethan, you might as well just watch the show. if you can somehow turn off your Jeffrey Dahmer switch for an hour or so, you might enjoy it. also, you could add to the discussion with a little more color.

Makes absolutely no sense. If I keep my Jeffery Dahmer switch on, I'm pretty sure I'd enjoy the criminal drama more, have more psychotically colorful contributions AND offer more qualified, first-hand knowledge of the workings of the criminally insane mind.

Dotzilla · **Posted:** Wed May 16, 2012 11:34 pm

jeffrey dahmer wasn't psychotic. or insane. he just couldn't connect to humanity in any way.

Aestu · **Posted:** Wed May 16, 2012 11:36 pm

Dotzilla wrote:

jeffrey dahmer wasn't psychotic. or insane. he just couldn't connect to humanity in any way.

You're wrong because I say so.

Jubbergun · **Posted:** Wed May 16, 2012 11:52 pm

Ha! Humorous Retort!

Your Pal,
Jubber

Dotzilla · **Posted:** Thu May 17, 2012 6:57 am

well i took a serial killer profiling class and i still have the text book. so...

Na Na Na Boo Boo. Stick your head in doo doo.

Aestu · **Posted:** Thu May 17, 2012 7:23 am

Dotzilla wrote:

well i took a serial killer profiling class

And in that class you learned that someone who drilled holes into the skulls of still-living victims to inject acid to turn them into zombies, ate parts of other victims, and tortured small animals, wasn't psychotic or insane?

Cannibalism and animal torture (the latter in particular) are typical symptoms of antisocial personality disorder. The urge to drill or otherwise manipulate the skull to manipulate perceived spirits within is a typical symptom of schizophrenia (e.g., "tin foil hat"). The fact he built a demonic altar and claimed spiritual motivations for his behavior corroborate him being schizophrenic (motivated by voices etc)

So what's the basis for saying this guy wasn't psychotic?
Let me ask you, if he wasn't psychotic, what would qualify as psychotic?

If you still have the textbook - quote for us where it says he wasn't psychotic.
And no, the fact that he was judged "fit to stand trial" doesn't count for shit.

Bucket Guild | FUBU BH Forums

@Sherlock

Who is online