|
It's BS. One big - typically feminist - statement of hypocrisy.
Feminism doesn't teach women to analyze anything. Feminists are a hate group, and like all hate groups they appeal to base emotions like fear and hysteria.
Feminists don't "unpack and examine" anything. Unpack what? Feminists discard reality and create their own. They disregard inconvenient facts and posit their own wild claims for reality. They take exceptions and turn them into the rule. This is one of the most noticeable things feminists do in any debate: when cornered on a topic, they will simply invent facts, claiming that it "must be so" or that the "patriarchy wrote the historical record, therefore the facts exist there's just no proof".
Most often they will simply make stuff up. Usually this takes the form of "my friend/sister/cousin..." or "there are many cases of...". The only debater that comes close to the feminists in terms of just making facts up is Ronald Reagan.
The proof this article is hypocritical nonsense is that they actually claim feminists have "the vocabulary" to "articulate" issues, when in reality the single most characteristic hallmark of feminist writing is using what the feminists think are educated-sounding words and phrases, either incorrectly or without meaning.
Feminists don't have any tools at all, which is why they resort to Kafkaesque laws and blatant extortion to get jobs and money for their constituents. They simply have nothing - nothing at all - to offer society. The entire purpose of the movement is to satisfy the greed of evil or misguided women. See: Fluke testimony. Trying to shake down Congress so feminists can bill for procedure then roll the proceeds into their political efforts because they simply don't have any real services to offer women.
So now that I've established this article is a feminist hypocrisy: What's REALLY going on here?
I'll tell you. The feminists know their Ponzi scheme is about to collapse. This is so for three reasons:
1. Education and psychology, their two biggest institutional bedrocks, are rapidly losing credibility.
It is highly probable that within ten years universities will see their enrollment drop substantially, not merely because fewer Americans are able to pay, but because more and more Americans simply believe that a college degree is not worth anything at all, certainly not the exorbitant cost (much of which is due to political leechers).
(I believe that in ten years, annual college enrollment will be less than half current levels. That is merely my conjecture though.)
The loss of all credibility by colleges will deprive feminists of a) sinecures for their cronies, b) institutional authority and prestige and c) a captive audience.
2. The increasingly irresistible power of corporations in American politics and economic planning.
Corps are self-interested. All they care about is what makes them money. Feminists don't contribute to that goal, and the corps are tired of being sued and harassed by these racketeers. As soon as they can, the corps will throw the feminists overboard, nullifying their racket laws and eliminating their public funding.
3. Male revolt
Male revolt is not a political movement. It is not the result of the so-called MRM, which is still bsaically irrelevant. It is the personal choices of millions of individual Western men. It is becoming increasingly common practice that the moment a man hears that a woman is a feminist, she is persona non grata.
That was fine for the demented lesbian terrorists and social outcasts that founded the movement and built it through lies, demagoguery, deceit, cronyism, and terrorism, but it's not fine for mainstream women who want jobs, husbands, and life fulfillment.
The feminists know all this. They know their days are numbered. And they know that every Ponzi scheme breaks down when more constituents are selling out than buying in. Example: Facebook IPO. It's also true of political Ponzi schemes like McCarthyism and the Salem Witch Trials, which collapsed when the accusers accused so many people to keep their momentum, they wound up losing all credibility.
Their ship is sinking, so now the feminists are trying to hijack someone else's. That is what this is all about. It is the same thing we saw when the Tea Party tried to lay claim to the OWS movement.
Some idiots may fail to see the deception, but in the end, it won't matter. The three social factors I cited will prove infinitely more decisive than whatever comes of the feminists' last efforts.
Aestu of Bleeding Hollow... Nihilism is a copout.
|
