Aestu wrote:
Eturnalshift wrote:
Based on the news coverage and tweets, it seems millions of people see the appeal even if you don't.
Quote:
manufactured hype
It's remarkable that you have such a high opinion of your judgement yet you fall for something so trite, and despite your high estimate of yourself you think that the opinions of "millions of people" is a good gauge of anything.
Sorry, champ. You're talking about the appeal of an event and how "you don't see it", and I'm simply pointing out that millions of others do. Call it manufactured if you want, but if individuals are talking about it on twitter, and if news agencies are reporting on an attempt to break a world record... then, just maybe, there's more to it than your crazy ass assertions.
Aestu wrote:
Eturnalshift wrote:
And this is 'serious business' to Red Bull, since they've created countless events which they've hosted and sponsored. Be it jumping snow mobiles, motorcycles and cars over the length of a football field during New Years Eve events... or having extreme races like X-Alps and the Air Race... or just extreme events like the Rampage, Flutag and X-Fighter... or just sponsoring hundreds of people in various extreme sports.
Fatalities?
Irrelevant?
Aestu wrote:
You're still talking about breaking the sound barrier with an object about as aerodynamic as a truck. And what exactly happens when he descends to the stratosphere travelling above terminal velocity at that altitude?
It's clear you don't understand what terminal velocity is.
First, he's jumping from the stratosphere, not descending from the mesosphere. Secondly, a person with their arms and legs tucked tightly together, with their head pointing towards the ground, can achieve a higher terminal velocity since there is much less resistance. If he breaks this form and goes into a flat fall, like what you normally see in sky diving, he'll hit a lower terminal velocity. When he deploys his parachute, the terminal velocity get's even lower. If he reached terminal velocity while having his parachute open, and then he released himself from the parachute, then his terminal velocity will increase.
We know, for a fact, that the air resistance at super-high elevations is much lower than that of the ground, causing less drag. Because there is less drag, he can achieve a higher terminal velocity. Fanta originally asked if he would hit the terminal velocity before breaking the sound barrier, and I'm saying that might not be the case. At his altitude, with his equipment, form, and mass, it's possible he could break 1,225.1 km/h. Kittinger was able to reach 988 km/h from a lower altitude.
Aestu wrote:
whether the thing is legitimate (how would you know he went past the sound barrier than them saying so?) or anything other than very expensive trivia is another.
Probably the same way any ground station can judge the speed of an object falling through the air and/or space; a network of sensors (like accelerometers and altimeters) and a team of professionals (physicists, mathematicians and aerospace experts) to interpret the data.
Aestu wrote:
Real "extreme" activities are dangerous. Danger means the odd man draws the black ticket. Death on camera means lawsuits and bad PR.
BRB. Trying to patent some new extreme sport ideas... Extreme Commuting to Work, Extreme Showering for the Elderly, Extreme Poison Drinking and Extreme Negro at a Klan Meeting.
Companies protect themselves with waivers and contracts. Live events, like this, often have delays to protect viewers from seeing people die... And when those fail, well, How many people sued Fox News last week when that guy killed himself on live TV?