Azelma wrote:
To say that your gender is not a part of your identity is just tomfoolery.
Now, I know you're going to argue with me and give me all these absurd reasons why your gender is not a part of your identity...but you'll be blowing smoke.
What is the first question asked when you find out someone is pregnant?
"Is it a boy or a girl?"
Why do we ask that question?
It is a part, but a much bigger part for women. Women talk about themselves as being women and seek to act in ways predicated on being a woman.
Ask a man or a woman about themselves, and the man will talk more about his values, personal history, etc, than a woman. Not for nothing do women consider being seen as beautiful important in a way men don't, and amusingly enough feminists identify with the color pink, flowers, and trappings of femininity such as purses even as they insist they don't want to be shackled by their gender.
We ask that question because - you're right, it's fundamental. But it drives home the absurdity of this ultra-liberal BS that thinks gender is a social construct. We aren't asking what gender the baby
thinks it is.
Eturnalshift wrote:
Aestu wrote:
Whether he's doing it based on principle or because he wants to look at nekkid chicks, I support his efforts 100%.
Aestu supports...
* underage girls looking at older middle-aged men's dicks
* older middle-aged men looking at young, naked teenage girls
Is that what I support? Or is that what those who would support these crazy laws support?