The "free market" is a contradiction in terms.
Markets do some things well - especially consumer goods. This is so because consumer goods offer the consumer absolute choice, including no choice.
Markets do healthcare poorly. This is so because barriers to entry and unequal choice are inherent in the practice of medicine. Government does healthcare well, something proven by countries that let the state run their healthcare programs.
Take WoW for example. I can buy WoW, or I can not buy WoW. If I decide not to buy WoW, I don't have to buy another MMO if I feel they all blow anyway. I can get some fresh air and hope my pallid skin doesn't ignite like tissue on a lightbulb, while I wait for the market to crash out and new options to emerge. I could also go buy some old retro video games.
By contrast, I don't have the luxury of deferring my purchase of healthcare or food, water, shelter, telecom or electricity or any other such staple. And my options for all those things are inherently more limited than my options as to ways to amuse myself.
Quote:
Our "free market" isn't free, it's a warped reflection of an Ayn Rand novel.
What you don't grasp is that the status quo is the inevitable result of Ayn Rand's pseudo-philosophy.
It's no coincidence that Ayn Rand chose completely fictional settings for her novels, and predicated their plots on unreal deus machinas. This is so because what she advocates is completely incompatible with how reality actually works.
She exclusively preferred the format of dramatic novels rather than historical/science fiction or dialectics because the former is an inherently less rigorous format: less demand for internal consistency, appeals to sentimentality rather than reason.
Ayn Rand's format and setting allowed her to ignore issues like the reality of limited resources, environmental degradation, speculation, bigotry, classism, and the sex economy. She makes unrealistic assumptions about human nature - how people will behave with power unchecked by law or social convention, and how people will behave when they are desperate.
The bureaucratic and corporate refuse clogging up the medical system exists because it is inevitable that people will organize to mutual advantage. The most basic example is the street gang. Free choice won't prevent the emergence of powerful self-interested multinational organizations any more than it does the emergence of street gangs because they both exist for the same reasons.
The only way to stop gangs is to change things so people don't have a reason to join them. The same is true of multinational corporations and that is why a public solution is the only option.