Laelia wrote:
Jubbergun wrote:
I wouldn't need a tow truck if the gas hadn't been siphoned in the first place, so that makes it kind of a moot point, now doesn't it?
This analogy is getting silly. Bringing it back to immigration, if illegal immigration is as harmful as you claim then the hypothetical gas has already been siphoned.The analogy
started silly, but I don't think you can complain because it was
your analogy. The point is that the people in Arizona are tired of the crap and are doing something about it. I'd say "if you don't like it, move to Arizona and vote against it," but they'd probably just deport you for being Canadian. The racial-profile for Canadians is pretty much anything wearing flannel that talks a little odd and smells of maple syrup.
Laelia wrote:
Jubbergun wrote:
I don't need evidence of anything to know that you're making assumptions other than evidence that your making assumptions...which you are. Also, Oyster Sales Fee? How many Latinos do you NOT know to come up with that one?
I think I'm making reasonable assumptions, given that the state's main income is from property and sales taxes, both of which are relatively difficult to evade. I could certainly be wrong, but in the absence of evidence one way or the other we nothing to go on except assumptions. The most parsimonious assumption here is that illegal immigrants pay these taxes at the same rate as citizens or legal immigrants. From your response it appears you don't have any reason to think otherwise.I have plenty of reason to think otherwise. Property taxes are generally only paid by property owners, and sales taxes are generally only paid when you buy at...participating retailers/licensed businesses...and there is a large underground economy in this country. You would not believe the things you could buy at a flea market here, and none of it is subject to a sales tax. You could argue that illegals "pay" property tax by way of their landlord/tenant relationship, but I don't think you can make a "fair share" argument given the condition of the sorts of dwellings they rent, which are generally run-down and would not assess at a rate similar to the dwellings owned by locals. This is overlooking how many illegals live in the rented space, which is generally what the average American would look at as "HOLYJESUSFUCKHOWDOTHEYALLLIVETHEREANDNOTKILLEACHOTHER?"
Laelia wrote:
(although I'm not sure which of my statements leads you to believe that I support exploiting immigrant workers).
Well then:
Laelia wrote:
The construction industry in the Toronto area depends on illegal immigrants to supply a significant part of their workforce. I might not have a house to live in if it wasn't for them.
You benefit because those people came to Canada and worked for less than the average Canadian would. You gained a benefit from this. That's exploitation,
Laelia wrote:
However, stating that you think there might be a problem is not the same as presenting evidence that there is actually a problem. Even doing so repeatedly, and this thread has certainly been repetitive, does not advance your argument. Beyond the paper that Boredalt linked, nobody has offered a shred of evidence that any of the things you mention are true.
Hey, if you want to believe it's all burritos and sombreros and that a flood of undereducated and extremely poor people rolling in doesn't cause any issues, that's fine. I'll assume since we're discussing this here, you has the interwebs in Canadia. You want somebody to prove something, fine. You prove to me that illegal immigration really isn't a problem. Until then, us dumb Americans are just going to handle this as we see fit until our wise and all-knowing friends from abroad inform us as to the appropriate and rainbow-friendly course of action...or until we have to come bail the rest of you out of some dumbassery in which you've become entangled.
I say Arizona didn't do enough by adopting the same standards used by the US Federal Government. It should have adopted the
Mexican standards, complete with machine gun nests on their southern border.
Your Pal,
Jubber