Quote:
Except that in some religions, the removal of certain pieces of clothing are seen as just as embarrassing and dishonorable as having your balls groped in public by a hairy old dude during a public strip search.
Then again, I don't expect you to know (or care) about anything but your world view.
Yea, because I'm so stupid back-woods hillbilly that hates all brown people, right? Sorry I'm not as edgy and progressive as you are, Golden-letter boy. (PS: You've never budged from your world view, either, dickface.)
You're making my point for me, though. Why do religious persons get protection from something that is equally offensive and embarrasing to individuals of no faith? Because of religion? You're one who often cites the separation of Church and State (often in the wrong sense, but I'll let it go because you're oh-so fucking smart and all), so why does the State give unequal protections? My position on this matter is that the TSA should give the option for passengers to pat themselves down if they extend that courtesy to religious persons... otherwise, treat everyone equally. (And to think earlier you had an issue with Profiling, yet you're fine with profiling?)
To the TSA's credit, clothing doesn't have to be removed if the machine can see through them, provided the passenger allows for that scan. Also, individuals could request a private room for the screening.
Quote:
EDIT: SPOILER: They already scan everyone. The only exception is whether or not you take off a headscarf. Its not like Muslim women get some kind of exemption from the entire screening process.
Spoiler's Spoiler?
Quote:
Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down your own scarf, including head and neck area, and have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands.