With regards to Quittermike, my discussion with you about this ends on this post. You obviously did not read the post, the quote I made, nor the video. Since you feel that quoting Wowwiki is innappropriate, I welcome you to read the book and provide a quote yourself. Other than that, you seem rather hurt that I came back with an intelligible post with regards to your lack of reading skills, and I welcome your further stupidity in this post if you like, but I won't waste my time responding to it any further because you lack the intelligence to fathom anything worthy of futher comment in this discussion.
@Dvergar...
Quote:
I think naive was the proper word here. I'm all for more humane treatment of animals but unless you're raiding and slaughtering them yourself that just isn't going to happen.
The guys in that video were screwed up individuals, unless you believe that every poultry/hog/cow processing plant is staffed by fucknuts, you can't assume that this is happening everywhere.
Like I said, I agreed with you that the act of one should not constitute the attitude of all. However, before I was igorant by not looking into this myself because of choice, lack of willingness to visit places like this, and lack of time that I choose to set aside to do these things. Therefore, as I said, I cannot feel that I can trust other companies and slaughterhouses until I spend some more time researching for myself their ways of slaughtering the animals that I have chosen to consume in the past. This is a personal choice, and if this seems logical to any of you, I welcome you to partake any bit of my feelings about this matter from this discussion.
@ Quadtard
Quote:
Link from Peta
its totally unbiased and every video is professionally made and researched, and nothing is ever fabricated. they also do a great job of portraying more than one side of the issue.
Yes, they were links from Peta. There are other links not from Peta as well as official documentation from the USDA that I came across. I do understand your sense of sarcasm fortunately so I will respond thusly so... not everything is biased, it did have a touch of professionalism with regards to the journalism related to the subject and it clearly wasn't fabricated. When you believe in one thing strongly enough, yes, things do look one sided in a discussion.
Same goes with religion, politics, and any other topic we'd care to talk about. That's why each person is fortunately capable of coming to their own conclusions about things and able to make their decisions based on their choices. This allows us to the words morals, integrity, and honesty. The problem lies in the situation caused by one company that may or may not represent the situation as the whole across the board. It also doesn't deter the fact that the possibility exists for other situations like this and it should be looked into. I used to laugh at people who cared about animals as I believed one day they would turn to fucking them and hope to marry them and give them rights like this, but I clearly misunderstood their intentions with regards to animals because I lacked the emotion to care, which has been changed now. This is why we have a brain, to rationalize for ourselves what is right and wrong. I feel this is wrong which if why I make the post, even if it is from PETA.
@Usdk
Quote:
Again paddywack, my point was about veganism. You want to argue with me about something completely different, and a hypothetical no less.
When the supreme alien overlords come and put us all in 2x2 cages, then we'll talk.
Yes, your point was about veganism, but you shield your feelings from some pretty honest questions. Philosophically, yes, there could be some alien overlord that will come and put us all in a 2x2 cage and if you feel like you want to open up the discussion then, that's fine.
You missed one of my points though in this thread. Emotion. Emotions connect to everything we do, even if you have a lack of them.
I asked you if you had any for your surroundings, and from your statement, would it be safe to say that you do not care for the destruction of the things around you?
Your argument was about being at the top of the food chain. I responded to that but my other points were ancillary, albeit philosophical. It does not deter the original point that I made. They enhance my point if anything. The video shows lack of emotions for their surroundings. This is a huge philosophical discussion to begin with when I first linked the video. Would you kick and punch and throw around an animal like that? What if it was your puppy? A cat? Fish? Anything you care about??? Say your child if you have one?
Hypothetical: One day a company mass produces babies for consumption. We all joke about dead babies. Would you really kill one this way?
It helps me understand this so I know which angle to take if you respond to this, which to be honest, I have appreciated so far. I just don't appreciate the inhumane treatment towards animals now.
@ The Board
If the video was doctored in any way, I wouldn't know. It doesn't looked scripted. I am sure if they showed the full 24 hours of that video or from start to end of it showing what happened, I doubt the arguement would still be there saying that it isn't happening all the time and it's over exaggerated.
I really welcome all of you to watch it, and be a bit more open minded about the discussion. If after watching the video you still feel the same way, so be it. Atleast then we will be able to argue the points of the video as well as the philosophical points of this discussion. Otherwise, you can be like Quittermike.