Krizen wrote:
lol, yeah. 51-45 quarterback shoot-outs are very boring and endless 3-1 hockey games are the epitome of excitement.
So two games a season are good, and they're good because 1/2 of the team is absolutely terrible. If you're such an ADD coke-fiend you need scoring all the time then go back to your no-touch puff football league.
Quote:
Rofl classic Canadian arguement: "THERES FITES IN HOCKEY THEREFORE ITS BETTAR, EH". If you actually watched football you'd know there are skirmishes on every drive. The only difference between football and hockey in that regard is that in football the refs don't let fights escalate.
It doesn't have anything to do with fighting, it has to do with respect for yourself, your game, and your fellow players. When people shoot off their mouth and get cocky they don't have to fight, they have to keep their head up or else they're gonna get destroyed by an open-ice check. Skirmished on every drive? Not even close, once in a blue moon someone might take a break from celebrating after every single play and push someone else, which is immediately broken up. Football doesn't need fighting, but don't call kindergarten level shove matches "skirmishes"
Quote:
what
2013: Continuing the trend in football, Sacks are no longer awarded by hitting the quarterback, but only accomplished by presenting him with a proper tea setting and inviting him to your garden after the game.
Quote:
You are so fucking uneducated about the opposing side; why are you even trying to argue? This is some of the stupidest shit I've ever seen, you bitter ass Canadian.
You're pretty easy to get going kid. Nice counter-argument though: "Yeah well, well, well ur just stupid". I'm from Pennsylvania btw, I'm just smart enough to recognize when one sport is better than another.