Krunkz wrote:
Way to leave out 50% of facts about my financial situation. Grats on missing the point of my post completely. Even more grats on finding a way to type a response that is twice as long as needed.
You might be speaking of your own response.
I addressed your point head-on and you disregarded that portion of my post in which I pointed out that your world view isn't rational or viable.
Krunkz wrote:
About the let a few go attitude I have. It might seem wrong to others but I have seen what happens when people desperately hold on to saving someone who has given up on every thing, including themselves. Some times when people don't want your help, it's best to leave well enough alone.
Again - facile response. You're fortunate enough to never have to be on the other side of that fence, not only because of your inheritance but because like you say you were fortunate enough to have family and work.
Would you be able to pull it together otherwise? Who knows? I say it not as an ad hominem but simply from what I see that you are sufficiently impaired by your usage that I am skeptical. I see pot is enough to hold you back from in-game goals. And my observations as such corroborate my convictions about the nature of pot.
Krunkz wrote:
This is the only scenario you will accept as ever happening because you were told weed is bad, weed is a gateway drug and weed raped your mom/sister/dog and ate your homework.
I was never told any such thing. You're seeing only the reflection of your own views.
I made no claims as to weed being a gateway drug - my conviction is that what weed can do is bad enough.