Eturnalshift wrote:
I don't get how the evil top whatever percent paying their much higher whatever percent is such a bad thing when it's very likely the top whatever percent is using a much smaller whatever percent of tax-funded services, meaning the evil top whatever percent is disproportionately paying into something which they're not the beneficiaries of and the bottom whatever percent isn't paying into something they're likely using.
False for three reasons:
1. The rich benefit more from what government does for the country as a whole: ensuring law, order and stability. The rich don't collect welfare checks but they benefit from the status quo; the alternative would be riots and civil disorder.
2. Corporate welfare and government contracts
3. I don't recall the last time a poor person filed for a patent, or sued for copyright infringement, or filed for a business license, or had to have their activities managed by the FAA/FCC/NIH/Federal Reserve
Your argument boils down to "I got mine" (which is hypocritical since you consider yourself "successful" yet everything you have was given to you by the government), but we are all in this together.
Most of the country is doing badly, but if the government stopped, the rich would lose a lot more than those who have little to begin with.