Aestu wrote:
The answer has been provided many times and ought not need to be provided even once because it is so obvious. Those who refuse to grasp it are willfully ignorant so I didn't see the point in spelling it out again.
History is the story of governments making a difference.
Different societies meet with different fates. Different governments and policies produce different futures for their people. Some things work, some don't. So the choices exist. And some are right and some are wrong. And if people and governments weren't at least somewhat successful in making choices, progress as we know it would not have happened. We'd still be back in the Dark Ages.
When you open up a history book, you never read about a great nation built by a bunch of people acting in their own self-interest. When you do read countries like that, they are always failed states, or at best flashes in the pan.
America is no exception; the American myth of the self-empowered individual is just that, a myth. Americans conveniently ignore the role of free and abundant natural resources, unionization, and farsighted national planning in building our society because they never read the history book but just drink the primetime TV koolaid, because it's easier. When they do read the history book, they just gawk at the cool pictures, or verbose equivalent, of Civil War / WWII glory, without asking how those wars fit into the big picture.
Our government in its current form can't legislate away our problems because the problems are social. And they are social precisely because of what we see in this very discussion which is a culture of stupidity and ignorance. A stupid and ignorant culture isn't going to accept wise policies until the status quo crashes out and the necessary steps are finally taken by an authoritarian successor-state. This has happened many times in history before.
All the people you named arrogantly think they know what's up and their ideas are right. But I've frequently asked them "well why do you believe this?" and I've never gotten a better answer than "because it's what I know is true". "Well what's your frame of reference?" From there the response is usually some kind of snark. These are people who are willfully ignorant because they are selfish and lazy, and the course they set for the nation will reflect that.
So that is your answer. Will you find it adequate now that you need not find it "curious" I didn't answer before? Or will you continue to lazily diffidate as always? Shall I gaze into my crystal ball?
Good answer. And I find it adequate, though it has given me some follow up questions.
I guess, since the problems are social, you seem to be of the mind that it will implode in some way...then an authoritarian will rise from the ashes and progress will begin again...until stupidity and ignorance crumble society once again, and it must be rebuilt. I'll buy this.
Would you say that is an accurate depiction of your view of the cycle of humanity? Each time it crumbles, a new, slightly better, "closer", state will come along? Would you say that Greece --> Rome ---> America ---> Some other state (and yes I left out a ton of states in the middle haha) is how it works...each better than their predecessor in some respects, worse in others...but overall "closer" to that Utopian goal?
You've answered the question about the state and government. But I must ask you the harshest question of all:
Why should you or I care? Why should you or I be individually motivated to make things fairer for everyone? We can agree that there are ills in society, we can agree that there are systems that are clearly broken. You and I will never be able to fix them. We won't be the authoritarian who changes the country/world. We will be dead before ignorance causes society's collapse, before a benevolent authoritarian is able to take power and adjust the course of the nation and the world.
Given those facts. Given the idea of "survival of the fittest" -- doesn't it stand to reason that it's logical to say, "well, most people are stupid and can't help themselves. Most people are selfish and greedy. Most people don't really give a fuck about anything but themselves/their kin. If I give a fuck, I might be able to improve something in some small way...but then again I might just end up having a rougher existence and not really accomplishing my goal of making the world better for the next generations (or even the current ones). If I die, I'll be underground, and I won't matter anymore. Unless reincarnation is real, this is my one shot at life. Given all that, isn't it much safer and logical to say "fuck that uncertainty. Got mine."?