Usdk wrote:
Ah the nra turned on a guy who supports their business because he allegedly fucks kids? those evil bastards.
No, they turned on him because he was making them look bad.
They LIED about their connection with him and his prior support of their policies.
They LIED and said that he was anti-gun when he was in fact strongly pro-gun.
He doesn't just "fuck kids". He uses guns and possibly arson in his crimes and hides behind the "home as castle" laws you advocate.
Quote:
You've been successfully manipulated by propaganda. Congratulations. But you haven't just been manipulated, you're been brainwashed, proof being you'll go right on believing what you do even after all these facts have been presented.
You linked a news article that you didn't have the
reading comprehension and critical thinking skills to analyze so you could understand what was actually going on, then you read another editorial about he was anti-gun, and didn't have the critical thinking skills to analyze that either and understand why it was all lies.
And now that someone who actually has decent
reading comprehension and critical thinking skills has connected the dots for you, you will STILL construct some crazy ass rationalization about why it ain't so.
You thought it was a case of a man being persecuted for defending his home with a gun. Instead it turned out to be something about as evil as it gets, a corrupt politician and lawyer who used guns and the gun lobby to empower him to sexually molest children.
What you thought was a case of guns ensuring safety of the home in fact proved to be a case of guns enabling the most vicious and despicable crimes there are.
Yet you'll still proceed just as if it were the former. You're brainwashed.
Anyway, I feel comfortable declaring victory here. Thread over!