Mns wrote:
Tehra wrote:
I like how you used to rant about people who questioned your sex life, but eventually came full circle and engaged in posting pictures of your debasement in an effort to derail more threads and gain said "acceptance".
This happened? I guess not reading 90% of what Aestu posts really nipped me in the ass this time around.
What, you have the one in the MOP
thread for starters.
or this one that he did eventually edit out the nude picture, which obviously belonged in the New York thread.
Usdk wrote:
Well there are seldom attractive black women so yes I'd like to see a picture merely for that factor. No, I don't want to see you fucking her.
I find that black women not of American descent tend to be more attractive. Either way, I think you're biased for many reasons.

I mean, I'm fairly sure you'll disapprove of her appearance, I'm fine with that honestly. I think Jubber would disagree with you but we'll let him speak for himself.
or the reply looking for attention from Kay:
She eventually turned out to be kind of erratic. She would disdain my texts then soon after ask why I hadn't talked to her. I think that she was kind of afraid of a relationship with a white guy (she said, dubiously, that her family thought she'd wind up with a white guy, implying they and she thought this eccentric or undesirable).
Oh well. Good times, move on.
That was why you bumped the thread, right? =)
Now, back on topic
Aestu wrote:
Tehra wrote:
Eturnal did whatever a journalist would do. Are you suggesting that's wasting time?
A journalist does what a journalist does. Why is Eturnal so determined to make his case about this particular issue? What's it to him?
Why are you so determined to sue a dining establishment for not dining?
Aestu wrote:
Tehra wrote:
You have nothing better to do with your time other than post about this whole thing on these forums and drum up support for your perceived slights in an effort to feel accepted. You should expect people to fact check your claims if you're looking to get sympathy in a manner like you claim Callysta does all the time.
I concede I was mistaken on at least one point. That said, I don't see anything wrong about posting about personal nonsense on the forum equivalent of Seinfeld.
Yeah, doing a search for all posts you've mentioned Callysta shows your disdain for "personal nonsense" used for "personal gain".
Aestu wrote:
Tehra wrote:
I like how you used to rant about people who questioned your sex life, but eventually came full circle and engaged in posting pictures of your debasement in an effort to derail more threads and gain said "acceptance".
I don't see the connection between freely discussing one's sex life in a thread about just that, and other people whining about my sex life or lack thereof because they're at odds about a WoW issue.
Oh, the sex thread? Yeah, that was a quaint read. Congrats, you've had sex, like the 22 billion people before you. I'd offer you a cookie, but I'd rather not have to go to small claims court when you chip a tooth.