Aestu wrote:
dek wrote:
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.
You can if you choose the horse!
dek wrote:
All they can do is provide incentives. Some people will not be attracted by them, but the fact that it will not miraculously cause a 100% retention rate does not mean it won't have an effect.
I take a teaspoon to the beach and say I did my part to prevent flooding from global warming.
dek wrote:
No, it won't be a perfect solution, but when you're dealing with shaping human behavior there are no perfect solutions.
Copout
EDIT: Forget it, Tuhl said it best. It's like the Oculus "fix": increase the incentives rather than make the game more fun.
What is a cop out about it? You are a complete fucking retard if you think you can craft a perfect solution to a perceived problem in human social structure.
They are providing incentives, the incentives will more than likely have the desired effect on some non-negligible scale.
You seem to be judging success of the initiative on whether it has absolute effectiveness, and that's really, and I mean monstrously, stupid. Like, if you were in a sociology class I was teaching, I would fail you.
You're really dumb.
edit: Or was that a cop out? I await you responding with something that makes no sense while you misuse a multi-syllable word that you think makes you look smart.

Akina: bitch I will stab you in the face