Mns wrote:
Paddywack wrote:
I am simply wanting to not support products that support animal cruelty.
Oh, can you direct me to the statement from Butterball saying that they're pro-cruelty?
Quote:
You really didn't read anything that I said about Wikipedia did you..? :(
No, I didn't, mainly because (just like this post), I don't read much of what you post.
Actions speak for words where none exist to explain what is happening. The video describes it without the need of words. If these employees are still currently working for Butterball, and Butterball is aware of their employee actions, then the company either is in favor of animal cruelty or they are playing ignorant, in which in this case is worse.
Imagine for a second there was no voice associated with the video, but you still saw the video, my reaction would be the same. The words don't influence my decision. The actions they are doing do.
With regards to your latter comment, that just isn't fair. We have no further need to discuss this then between the both of us, as I feel you don't care and if that is the case, why bother replying to begin with?
At this point of the discussion, I am open minded about both my correct and incorrect statements and I want to learn more about companies that explain their slaughtering processes. Anyone with this information would be greatly appreciated in sharing this information. Also, I've learned a few new words from this discussion alone and love to keep learning new things so all of you have had some great points and some meek points but the sake of the discussion now, for me, has become one that has turned into learning more about slaughtering processes and seeing what sources anyone has that might be useful for me to check out.